Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

View Poll Results: Should Speaking English be Mandatory
Yes 12 48.00%
Yes
12 48.00%
No 12 48.00%
No
12 48.00%
Not Sure 1 4.00%
Not Sure
1 4.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-05-2017, 10:55 PM #101
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Ok, to play along. Let's sack the interpreters, now where is that money going to go instead?
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 10:58 PM #102
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
Some people just see "Big Numbaz" and don't understand what they actually represent.

A quick google shows that the NHS spends £23,000,000 on translators per year. DAS BIG NUMBAZ! Economy panic!

... ... it's actually 0.0002% of the NHS budget. .
It's £23,000,000 less being spent on medical care. That would buy a lot of care.

But never mind such small numbaz don't matter when the NHS is in such a state. Let's just beez clever anz quote numbaz instead of thinking about ze extraz care zat money could buy.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 10:59 PM #103
MB.'s Avatar
MB. MB. is offline
like the boys
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 33,551

Favourites (more):
BBCanada 8: Minh-Ly
Survivor 40: Michele


MB. MB. is offline
like the boys
MB.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 33,551

Favourites (more):
BBCanada 8: Minh-Ly
Survivor 40: Michele


Default

I like how Marsh is vehemently fighting for both sides of the argument at the same time here
__________________


Spoiler:



MB. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 10:59 PM #104
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
It's £23,000,000 less being spent on medical care. That would buy a lot of care.

But never mind such small numbaz don't matter when the NHS is in such a state. Let's just beez clever anz quote numbaz instead of thinking about ze extraz care zat money could buy.
No, I asked you to quote numbers because simply saying "XYZ should not happen because it costs money" is not a valid debate.

Everything costs money.

Bringing actual facts and figures into the discussion is obvious.

Last edited by Marsh.; 06-05-2017 at 10:59 PM.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:00 PM #105
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MB. View Post
I like how Marsh is vehemently fighting for both sides of the argument at the same time here
I'm calling out bulls*t comments, I don't care who made them.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:01 PM #106
Cherie's Avatar
Cherie Cherie is offline
This Witch doesn't burn
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 67,161

Favourites (more):
Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey
BB19: Sian


Cherie Cherie is offline
This Witch doesn't burn
Cherie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 67,161

Favourites (more):
Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey
BB19: Sian


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
It's £23,000,000 less being spent on medical care. That would buy a lot of care.

But never mind such small numbaz don't matter when the NHS is in such a state. Let's just beez clever anz quote numbaz instead of thinking about ze extraz care zat money could buy.


I like how we are so far gone 23,000,000 is peanuts
Cherie is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:01 PM #107
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
Ok, to play along. Let's sack the interpreters, now where is that money going to go instead?
Sick patients!
Brillopad is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:02 PM #108
Cherie's Avatar
Cherie Cherie is offline
This Witch doesn't burn
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 67,161

Favourites (more):
Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey
BB19: Sian


Cherie Cherie is offline
This Witch doesn't burn
Cherie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 67,161

Favourites (more):
Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey
BB19: Sian


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
Sick patients!
Not to the hospital shop
Cherie is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:02 PM #109
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
Sick patients!
That's a broad topic there pal.

Are you suggesting we put £ 23, 000, 000 into a sack and have a prize draw for the patients who have beds?
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:02 PM #110
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Money is spent on NHS vending machines. I am disgusted.

How much money is spent on Quavers that could be spent on cancer research?
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:04 PM #111
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
I'm calling out bulls*t comments, I don't care who made them.
What's bull**** then - as you seem to think you have all the answers. Explain how you know better.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:05 PM #112
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
What's bull**** then - as you seem to think you have all the answers. Explain how you know better.
Where have I suggested I have all the answers?

I'm not the one adamantly claiming £23 million is being spent in the wrong place and suggesting we send it to "sick people".
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:07 PM #113
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
Money is spent on NHS vending machines. I am disgusted.

How much money is spent on Quavers that could be spent on cancer research?
You seriously comparing quavers and £23,000,000 of precious NHS money wasted on non-mecical care.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:09 PM #114
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie View Post


I like how we are so far gone 23,000,000 is peanuts
Well, do tell what huge difference making all of the interpreters unemployed (oh nooooo not more job seekers allowance) achieves? Is this 23 million equally spread across the entire NHS out of fairness, you know where it would make absolute sod all difference?
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:09 PM #115
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
Where have I suggested I have all the answers?

I'm not the one adamantly claiming £23 million is being spent in the wrong place and suggesting we send it to "sick people".
So you think spending on interpreters is more important than spending on medical care? Not in my book.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:10 PM #116
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
You seriously comparing quavers and £23,000,000 of precious NHS money wasted on non-mecical care.
Well, you add up all of those Quaver bags and you have quite a pile of money. We might fight the obesity epidemic that is DRAINING our country too.

But, whilst we're at it let's sack the office staff and the grounds keepers and any other "non-medical care" and you might realise what a ridiculous Utopia you have dreamt up.

Last edited by Marsh.; 06-05-2017 at 11:10 PM.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:11 PM #117
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
Well, do tell what huge difference making all of the interpreters unemployed (oh nooooo not more job seekers allowance) achieves? Is this 23 million equally spread across the entire NHS out of fairness, you know where it would make absolute sod all difference?
Seriously that is a very silly comment. I'm sure that amount of money could save lives. Even one life saved would be far more worthwhile than interpreters for people who shouldn't need them.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:12 PM #118
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
So you think spending on interpreters is more important than spending on medical care? Not in my book.
More important? No.

Just like I don't think the canteen girl's wages are more important than serious medical treatment. But then, neither the canteen girl nor the interpreter are draining the NHS budget from taking care of Betty in bed 2.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:13 PM #119
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie View Post


I like how we are so far gone 23,000,000 is peanuts
It's like 30p per person in the UK per year. It is literally less than peanuts.
user104658 is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:13 PM #120
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
Seriously that is a very silly comment. I'm sure that amount of money could save lives. Even one life saved would be far more worthwhile than interpreters for people who shouldn't need them.
Yeah, and I'm sure one saved life would be more important than the guy brushing leaves in the car park. But.... nobody's ranting about that.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:15 PM #121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
Well, you add up all of those Quaver bags and you have quite a pile of money. We might fight the obesity epidemic that is DRAINING our country too.

But, whilst we're at it let's sack the office staff and the grounds keepers and any other "non-medical care" and you might realise what a ridiculous Utopia you have dreamt up.
This gets sillier by the minute - office staff etc are needed to help provide the care. Lazy people wasting tax payers money are not.

I know more about this than you clearly do so I won't waste my time anymore.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:17 PM #122
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
It's like 30p per person in the UK per year. It is literally less than peanuts.
The total is not peanuts - it would help a lot of people.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:20 PM #123
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
This gets sillier by the minute - office staff etc are needed to help provide the care. Lazy people wasting tax payers money are not.
So, out of every penny of the NHS budget (I'm guessing you have scanned over it here) the biggest waste you could find on "non-medical" care is interpreters? Really?

Also, the only way someone cannot be fluent in English (especially when it comes to discussing medical issues and treatment which is a tough thing to do even when Doctor/Patient share a language) is them being "lazy people"? Really?

Oh but, wait...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
I know more about this than you clearly do so I won't waste my time anymore.
Oh yes. Of course. I forgot...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
It is very expensive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
I work in the NHS and have arranged interpreters.
Well, it's hard to debate these stone cold facts.

But, wait. I work in the NHS and serve chips.

It is very expensive.

Last edited by Marsh.; 06-05-2017 at 11:22 PM.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:26 PM #124
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
So, out of every penny of the NHS budget (I'm guessing you have scanned over it here) the biggest waste you could find on "non-medical" care is interpreters? Really?

Also, the only way someone cannot be fluent in English (especially when it comes to discussing medical issues and treatment which is a tough thing to do even when Doctor/Patient share a language) is them being "lazy people"? Really?

Oh but, wait...



Oh yes. Of course. I forgot...





Well, it's hard to debate these stone cold facts.

But, wait. I work in the NHS and serve chips.

It is very expensive.
I serve chips do l. Why did I waste my time at uni I wonder.
Brillopad is offline  
Old 06-05-2017, 11:27 PM #125
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
I serve chips do l. Why did I waste my time at uni I wonder.
No.

I serve chips. How else do you think I know so much about how much of the NHS budget is wasted on Quavers?

Last edited by Marsh.; 06-05-2017 at 11:28 PM.
Marsh. is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
britain, coming, english, mandatory, migrants, speaking


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts