[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Of course you don't - so I wonder why several posters have accused you of it previously. Stop playing the innocent and insulting the intelligence of many posters. People can read.

I've had one infaction in 2017 and its because you found me calling you 'luv' insulting

(Does that make you PC or a valid breath of fresh air btw?)

aside from this, I dont remember any other poster claiming I've been insulting... Unlike you, who just admitted you use PC as a way to insult, and therefore has insulted 10+ members throughout your time on tibb

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

I've had one infaction in 2017 and its because you found me calling you 'luv' insulting

(Does that make you PC or a valid breath of fresh air btw?)

aside from this, I dont remember any other poster claiming I've been insulting... Unlike you, who just admitted you use PC as a way to insult, and therefore has insulted 10+ members throughout your time on tibb

Yes they have - convienent memory block you have there. I admitted nothing as my comment on 'pot and kettle' was referring to your intent and hypocrisy, not agreeing I was actually doing what you accused me of. Don't try to put words in my mouth.

As for your infraction - I am not a mod and don't dish them out. If you are going to make sexist comments when you get so upset and offended at comments you perceive as racist, I guess you have no grounds for complaint.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Yes they have - convienent memory block you have there. I admitted nothing as my comment on 'pot and kettle' was referring to your intent and hypocrisy, not agreeing I was actually doing what you accused me of. Don't try to put words in my mouth.

As for your infraction - I am not a mod and don't dish them out. If you are going to make sexist comments when you get so upset and offended at comments you perceive as racist, I guess you have no grounds for complaint.

I'd never make a sexist comment, luv isnt sexist. That tibb rule purely exists for your benefit because you're a valid breath of fresh air, I can call any other member 'luv' without being infracted if I wish to do so.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

I'd never make a sexist comment, luv isnt sexist. That tibb rule purely exists for your benefit because you're a valid breath of fresh air, I can call any other member 'luv' without being infracted if I wish to do so.

It is as 'sexist' as the 'racist' allegations are 'racist'. They are either both valid, or not. Can't have it both ways. Dish it out don't complain if others give it back.

My comment on 'a breath of fresh air' seems to have ruffled a few feathers judging by the sarcastic comments. I found a poster's comments very open and honest - a breath of fresh air. I stand by that. No need to take it so personally.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

It is as 'sexist' as the 'racist' allegations are 'racist'. They are either both valid, or not. Can't have it both ways. Dish it out don't complain if others give it back.

My comment on 'a breath of fresh air' seems to have ruffled a few feathers judging by the sarcastic comments. I found a poster's comments very open and honest - a breath of fresh air. I stand by that. No need to take it so personally.

I am so certain that I've never said that a tibb member was a racist. Thats a very strong and very serious allegation. Your comparisons are odd. (Your breath of fresh air comment 'ruffled feathers' because it is hilariously hypocritical, I think you see that, right? I'll explain it just in case - lefties who get offended are PC, righties who get offended are breaths of fresh air - its honestly hilarious, albeit unintentionally)

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

I am so certain that I've never said that a tibb member was a racist. Thats a very strong and very serious allegation. Your comparisons are odd. (Your breath of fresh air comment 'ruffled feathers' because it is hilariously hypocritical, I think you see that, right? I'll explain it just in case - lefties who get offended are PC, righties who get offended are breaths of fresh air - its honestly hilarious, albeit unintentionally)

That poster wasn't playing mind games she was giving an honest and open opinion. Why did that upset you so much I wonder. Either your comprehension skills were lacking at that time or mind games are still the name of the game.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

It is as 'sexist' as the 'racist' allegations are 'racist'. They are either both valid, or not. Can't have it both ways. Dish it out don't complain if others give it back.

My comment on 'a breath of fresh air' seems to have ruffled a few feathers judging by the sarcastic comments. I found a poster's comments very open and honest - a breath of fresh air. I stand by that. No need to take it so personally.

Luv isn't sexist, it's a colloquialism .. Trust me I'm from Leeds, everyone and his dog is a luv.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Luv isn't sexist, it's a colloquialism .. Trust me I'm from Leeds, everyone and his dog is a luv.

A lot of women do find it offensive, just as some find any opposition to immigration offensive, just as some find any criticism of Islam offensive, just as some find certain discussions in lectures offensive. If you support one type of offense you can't ignore another.

As I said before all or nothing. Some will keep being selective on this subject according to their own personal opinions. It is hypocritical. Who are you, or anyone else, to pass judgement on who and who doesn't have the right to be offended.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

A lot of women do find it offensive, just as some find any opposition to immigration offensive, just as some find any criticism of Islam offensive, just as some find certain discussions in lectures offensive. If you support one type of offense you can't ignore another.

As I said before all or nothing. Some will keep being selective on this subject according to their own personal opinions. It is hypocritical. Who are you, or anyone else, to pass judgement on who and who doesn't have the right to be offended.

But you DO object to these terms . I'm totally confused. If it's "all or nothing" - are you opposed to Political Correctness or not? Is it ok for the forum to call you "luv" or not? If it isn't, if you find it offensive, then by your OWN admission, you cannot tell people what the can or can't find offensive... and therefore, you are in support of "PC"... luv.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

A lot of women do find it offensive, just as some find any opposition to immigration offensive, just as some find any criticism of Islam offensive, just as some find certain discussions in lectures offensive. If you support one type of offense you can't ignore another.

As I said before all or nothing. Some will keep being selective on this subject according to their own personal opinions. It is hypocritical. Who are you, or anyone else, to pass judgement on who and who doesn't have the right to be offended.

What... You mean like being accused of being PC for being offended?


You have backed yourself into a corner here.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

A lot of women do find it offensive, just as some find any opposition to immigration offensive, just as some find any criticism of Islam offensive, just as some find certain discussions in lectures offensive. If you support one type of offense you can't ignore another.

As I said before all or nothing. Some will keep being selective on this subject according to their own personal opinions. It is hypocritical. Who are you, or anyone else, to pass judgement on who and who doesn't have the right to be offended.

That time you fought for an 'all or nothing' approach whilst claiming luv is offensive and continuing to criticise islam and immigration. You really struggle with the concept of hypocrisy lol.