[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Hayden

I totally get the "we'll if you lose to jury it's because you're relationships with them were poor" argument, but this is a jury who, in EVERY segment were emphasising how they would not tolerate bitterness and bitter voting. Tie this in with the fact that the jury told Demetres (via Sindy) that they were less likely to vote fir him if he didn't cut Ika, then this shows a high level of hypocrisy.

Oh I definitely agree that they seem to have contradicted everything they said in the jury segments, but then again we only see a few minutes each week so it's possible our perception is distorted. Maybe the more comps he won, the more they couldn't discount him. Like I said, I definitely believe Ika played better cause I value social manipulation more, but I don't think a Demika F2 is as clear cut as a Kevin/Karen one is. They both helped each other - her socially, while his comp wins kept them safe. If you consider it objectively you could easily make an argument for either of them to win, and that's probably why the jury's opinion seems to have swayed.

If there's evidence that Demetres or Ika would've lost to Karen though then I'd be inclined to agree, that's a whole different ballgame. I'm very surprised that Demika would've genuinely taken each other to F2 actually, I find that astounding