Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20-06-2017, 04:39 PM #1
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,257


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,257


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth View Post
Labour oppose everything anyways, thats what mindless protestors do. But put a protest party in charge and you have serious problems. We only have austerity because of labour in the first place lol They also brought in tuition fee,s hospital car parking charges, deregulation of the banks, which in turn saw banks lend insane amounts of money that could never be paid back in a lifetime...but the liberal students dont get taught that do they...It doesnt suit their left wing agenda to actually teach the full truth... First off,every labour mp would need to buy a calculator each
The opposition in opposing shocker eh

And we don't have austerity because of Labour. We have austeiry as the Conservatives want it that way. Austerity actually slows growth too, so **** knows why they went down that route...also..the banking crash would have been even worse under the Tories as they wanted LESS regulation on the banks.

Last edited by Vicky.; 20-06-2017 at 04:40 PM.
Vicky. is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 01:54 PM #2
joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,250

Favourites (more):
CBB2025: Danny Beard
BB2023: Jordan


joeysteele joeysteele is offline
Remembering Kerry
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: with Mystic Mock
Posts: 44,250

Favourites (more):
CBB2025: Danny Beard
BB2023: Jordan


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky. View Post
The opposition in opposing shocker eh

And we don't have austerity because of Labour. We have austeiry as the Conservatives want it that way. Austerity actually slows growth too, so **** knows why they went down that route...also..the banking crash would have been even worse under the Tories as they wanted LESS regulation on the banks.

Well said Vicky.

Dear me the Cons even opposed the minimum wage legislation when Labour was in govt.
How odd to have oppositions actually opposing.

It's why I'd prefer a change to the electoral system to help steer to more concensus politics.

I've made the point many times in the past on here too, the Cons wanted the Banks regulated less between 2005 to the time of the worldwide financial crash.

It would as you say,have been likely far worse had the Cons taken govt in 2005 and then actually carried out regulating the Banks less.

Last edited by joeysteele; 11-09-2017 at 01:55 PM.
joeysteele is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
ahead, commons, deal, dup, majority, queens, speech


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts