| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Labour oppose everything anyways, thats what mindless protestors do. But put a protest party in charge and you have serious problems. We only have austerity because of labour in the first place lol They also brought in tuition fee,s hospital car parking charges, deregulation of the banks, which in turn saw banks lend insane amounts of money that could never be paid back in a lifetime...but the liberal students dont get taught that do they...It doesnt suit their left wing agenda to actually teach the full truth... First off,every labour mp would need to buy a calculator each
Last edited by the truth; 20-06-2017 at 04:16 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
0_o
|
Quote:
![]() And we don't have austerity because of Labour. We have austeiry as the Conservatives want it that way. Austerity actually slows growth too, so **** knows why they went down that route...also..the banking crash would have been even worse under the Tories as they wanted LESS regulation on the banks. Last edited by Vicky.; 20-06-2017 at 04:40 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
Well said Vicky. Dear me the Cons even opposed the minimum wage legislation when Labour was in govt. How odd to have oppositions actually opposing. It's why I'd prefer a change to the electoral system to help steer to more concensus politics. I've made the point many times in the past on here too, the Cons wanted the Banks regulated less between 2005 to the time of the worldwide financial crash. It would as you say,have been likely far worse had the Cons taken govt in 2005 and then actually carried out regulating the Banks less. Last edited by joeysteele; 11-09-2017 at 01:55 PM. |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|