[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Tbf they said it to her face too and were slated for that as it was 'nasty'

So...of course it will be mentioned as its obvious and very in your face, so should they be bitching behind backs or saying it to her?

Both are nasty, or are we now claiming that slating looks to someone's face is somehow noble?

Why would you slate the appearance of someone you just met? Where do you draw the line? Are disfigurements fair game?

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Both are nasty, or are we now claiming that slating looks to someone's face is somehow noble?

Why would you slate the appearance of someone you just met? Where do you draw the line? Are disfigurements fair game?

Did you just compare a fake tan to a disfigurement lol.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

Did you just compare a fake tan to a disfigurement lol.

No.

Are disfigurements fair game? What about acne? Hair loss?

I'm just trying to gauge how far Lotion's fans would go to defend him.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

No.

Are disfigurements fair game? What about acne? Hair loss?

I'm just trying to gauge how far Lotion's fans would go to defend him.

Idk, Lotans my least favourite housemate by a clear mile. Joes my 3rd least favourite. None of the things you mentioned are similar to fake tan (obviously)

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

Idk, Lotans my least favourite housemate by a clear mile. Joes my 3rd least favourite. None of the things you mentioned are similar to fake tan (obviously)

It doesn't matter what you subjectively think is similar to what. There is a basic level of manners and decency that most people have that prevents them slating the looks of people they have just met.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

It doesn't matter what you subjectively think is similar to what. There is a basic level of manners and decency that most people have that prevents them slating the looks of people they have just met.

If it doesnt matter, then why did you ask me multiple times about them lol.

Manners does not cover ignoring a person who has painted themselves head to toe in any non-human colour imo

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Both are nasty, or are we now claiming that slating looks to someone's face is somehow noble?

Why would you slate the appearance of someone you just met? Where do you draw the line? Are disfigurements fair game?

You just said the problem was them talking behind her back :S

Pointing out something as obvious as that tan, and questioning it I really do not see as a problem. Especially as she was taking the piss out of her own tan a few mins earlier in the task.

Genuinely do not understand why some people are so wound up by this. Lotan and Joe have many faults, but this seems a bit of a daft reason to egt worked up about. Isabelle didn't care either

To answer your final question, if I met someone who had overdone the fake tan to that extent then yes I probably would mention it. Especially if I had been drinking and the person had already been talking about it. I don't understand the comparison with disfigurement? I guess my line would be ridiculous self inflicted things (an example given earlier...oversized plastic tits) are fair game. Much like those idiots who are injecting dye into their eyeballs to look like aliens, I would DEFINTIELY talk about that. Disfigurements..no. Assuming you mean actual disfigurements rather than overinflated ducklips, the stupid new eyebrow trend and stuff? Eg. A burnt face from a fire or something. Of course I wouldn't mention that unless the person themselves brought it up