[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Hmm PMQs led with this heresay too.... It's almost like it was brand new information, he dislikes nukes, he would prefer there not to be nukes. Labour are in favour therefore he has to take the parties line ... Nothing has changed.

He broke a manifesto promise - he lied. What next? You would be quicker than the speed of light to jump on May for the same. At least she was more honest.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

He broke a manifesto promise - he lied. What next? You would be quicker than the speed of light to jump on May for the same. At least she was more honest.

He never suggested he was in favour of trident.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

He broke a manifesto promise - he lied. What next? You would be quicker than the speed of light to jump on May for the same. At least she was more honest.

He hasn't

He has never pretended to be a fan of trident. But he specifically said it was not his decision alone (which is true) and that the policy on trident was a labour party position, not his own personal one. And nothings changed

It would be an issue if he was actually scrapping Trident after saying he/the party would not. but thats not the case here...

JC in not a fan of nukes shocker...

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

He hasn't

He has never pretended to be a fan of trident. But he specifically said it was not his decision alone (which is true) and that the policy on trident was a labour party position, not his own personal one. And nothings changed

It would be an issue if he was actually scrapping Trident after saying he/the party would not. but thats not the case here...

JC in not a fan of nukes shocker...

Pretty much, this is a case of people rushing to find reasons to hate JC without taking the time to pay attention to the facts.