[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I was aware, but why, if they felt bad about not voting in the referendum, which was purely about Brexit, did they bother to make a big point of rallying round to vote in the election - when Brexit was already a done deal and Corbyn wanted it as much as any leaver.

If they were thinking of Brexit - it was pointless. If not, why all the hysterical garbage about the young who missed the boat on the referendum coming out to vote in the election - it had bugger all to do with Brexit. It was an entirely different vote as the chance was gone and JC was one of it's biggest supporters. Neither does he want a soft Brexit. So?

With Corbyn we simply get a hard Brexit - with open borders from both inside and outside the EU. A free-for-all. Bearing in mind one of the main reasons many voted for Brexit was to have control over our own borders it would be a complete betrayal.

Hard Brexit, open borders and financial deficits and bankruptcy due to over-spending thanks to JC would be our future.

I suggest you read things better.

And I suggest you don't do your homework with bias sources


1. Labour accepts free movement has to end but it is attracted to a model under which any EU citizen with the offer of a job could come to work in the UK.

2. Labour’s flexibility on free movement means it could be in a stronger position than the Conservatives to negotiate privileged access to the single market in talks with the EU.

3. Labour leaves a chink of light over Britain staying in the customs union. Mrs May would definitely pull the UK out.

4. Labour appears more accommodating than the Tories towards the European Court of Justice

The Labour manifesto pledged to remove Britain from the single market and no ECJ or Free movement.