[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by JTM45

It's just my generous nature.

Have you anything to back up your implications that the Express is not a reliable source other than perhaps listening to those on here who like to tell us what are and what are not reliable sources.

Those, for instance, who try to get one paper banned on here whilst regularly posting from sources known for fake news.

That is nonsence too.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Have you anything to back up your implications that the Express is not a reliable source other than perhaps listening to those on here who like to tell us what are and what are not reliable sources.

Those, for instance, who try to get one paper banned on here whilst regularly posting from sources known for fake news.

That is nonsence too.

Wot...Who is this then?

The express along with other tabloids are specifically right leaning. That aside how can a newspaper make clear what the PM can't? :/

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Wot...Who is this then?

The express along with other tabloids are specifically right leaning. That aside how can a newspaper make clear what the PM can't? :/

Yes it is right leaning - but it presents the facts. It doesn't make them up.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Yes it is right leaning - but it presents the facts. It doesn't make them up.

And who does? You do know nobody is aware of the ramifications of brexit yet don't you?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

And who does? You do know nobody is aware of the ramifications of brexit yet don't you?

I do. But there was a referendum and, just like an election, the majority vote won - and that was for Brexit. Since then so many remainders have attempted to interfere with that vote and shout about a second referendum. So if we did and it went the remainers' way and the leavers then cried and whined and demanded a third referendum where would we be. How many would we need to satisfy everyone - we never would - and that is why the first vote has to be the one that counts. Anything else is just a joke.

Some believe in the positives that can be had from Brexit if we are all behind it whilst others insist on believing in all the doom and gloom suggested by some.

As was said by someone more informed than most, Jacob Rees-Mogg, in a previous thread I made today, "there is no hard or soft Brexit , we are leaving the EU", all this hard/soft nonsence has only ever been the remainers' attempts at down-grading Brexit to suit their own agendas. We are leaving the EU and we all have to try and get the best deal for Britain. That is it really.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I do. But there was a referendum and, just like an election, the majority vote won - and that was for Brexit. Since then so many remainders have attempted to interfere with that vote and shout about a second referendum. So if we did and it went the remainers' way and the leavers then cried and whined and demanded a third referendum where would we be. How many would we need to satisfy everyone - we never would - and that is why the first vote has to be the one that counts. Anything else is just a joke.

Some believe in the positives that can be had from Brexit if we are all behind it whilst others insist on believing in all the doom and gloom suggested by some.

As was said by someone more informed than most, Jacob Rees-Mogg, in a previous thread I made today, "there is no hard or soft Brexit , we are leaving the EU", all this hard/soft nonsence has only ever been the remainers' attempts at down-grading Brexit to suit their own agendas. We are leaving the EU and we all have to try and get the best deal for Britain. That is it really.

Why are you saying this to me? I have never suggested there should be another referendum :/

So basically in his say 500 words when 3 will do way he said 'brexit means brexit' gee, thanks for that ghoul mogg!

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

That aside how can a newspaper make clear what the PM can't? :/

Lol! What an excellent point.