[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Of course it's not a deterrent, bright less well off kids still have ambition, the ethical question is is it right to exploit them in this way?
It should be criminal to agree terms of a loan and then ramp up the interest if it was anyone other that this corrupt bunch of shysters there would be uproar :/

Have you even read the article - it stated that free uni education for all would force the treasurey to impose caps on student numbers. How would that benefit the many?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Have you even read the article - it stated that free uni education for all would force the treasurey to impose caps on student numbers. How would that benefit the many?

It would benefit the brightest fairly across the board based on ability, it worked for years didn't it?
So what if they have to impose caps the onus should be on quality not quantity.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It would benefit the brightest fairly across the board based on ability, it worked for years didn't it?
So what if they have to impose caps the onus should be on quality not quantity.

Suddenly you are getting elitist. I thought Corbynites cared about the many. Or is that only when it suits.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Suddenly you are getting elitist. I thought Corbynites cared about the many. Or is that only when it suits.

Not sure you understand the context, it's not shocking to expect a certain standard of education especially as it is costing you thousands per year...:/
Only Corbynites care about the many...What do you care about then the few?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Not sure you understand the context, it's not shocking to expect a certain standard of education especially as it is costing you thousands per year...:/
Only Corbynites care about the many...What do you care about then the few?

You said it 'quality not QUANTITY' (as in many). Like May (grammar schools) you want opportunities for the brightest, not the many.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

You said it 'quality not QUANTITY' (as in many). Like May (grammar schools) you want opportunities for the brightest, not the many.

Since when should 'the many' mean poor students alone? I didn't ever allude to that, you seem to think I have the same 'us and them' chip you are displaying here.
'The many' mean the brightest irrespective of income. Why is this so hard for you to comprehend? there has always been a benchmark for entry

To clarify, I should like to see free uni places FOR ALL.