[chuff me dizzy]

In the chose to save task the Kray sister had an unfair advantage as it was a given they were going to save each other ..... Good ploy BB to have one or both of them in the final, but its was blatantly seen by viewers

[Littlegreen]

From the beginning the paired up housemates always had an unfair advantage.

Maybe there should have been a rule in place that they cannot vote the other half to save/evict?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Littlegreen

From the beginning the paired up housemates always had an unfair advantage.

Maybe there should have been a rule in place that they cannot vote the other half to save/evict?

Yes i agree, it was a given last night before they even entered the room that both were safe

[storybrooke]

Yeah I agree it was unfair and obvious they would pick each other.
However, I do like them both but I can definitely see your point

[Withano]

Pairs, on paper, had an advantage from the beginning because they were never gonna nominate each other - yet all pairs but the sisters have been eliminated, and people often nominate them with the reason 'I wanna see them separated'. Overall it looks like the pairs have had it worse than the single housemates somehow, so I dont mind a game in their favour for a change.

[y.winter]

Yes, they have this advantage, but it's also a disadvantage as they can easily be nominated solely for having the "double" factor, even if they give people no other reason to nominate them. In the end, so far it might be the first and only time it actually saved one of them.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by y.winter

Yes, they have this advantage, but it's also a disadvantage as they can easily be nominated solely for having the "double" factor, even if they give people no other reason to nominate them. In the end, so far it might be the first and only time it actually saved one of them.

Im talking about in this task