| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
And the amendment is a story for another day, right now this guy who you purport to be the 'voice of reason' clearly isn't.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Violence on both sides is unnecessary and gets nobody anywhere. The rally was legal with a permit.Without the left going there to try and shut it down with bats,concrete filled bottles,bricks,knives,urine and faeces there wouldn't have been all the violence. Both sides are guilty is what he is pointing out and violence loses you the argument and is usually the conclusion when you lack the skills to make a solid argument. So yes,I believe he is the voice of reason. Last edited by Northern Monkey; 16-08-2017 at 07:56 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
It's a straw man argument, having trump in the whitehouse has empowered the extreme right which in turn has spurned an extreme counter group, it's reactionary, yes that's understood. Yet how does it make this right wing mouthpiece with his derogatory mocking monologuing the voice of reason?
__________________
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|