[Jodie.]

I think so x

I C O N I C series

[Daniel.]

No, it has classic moments and great housemates but was boring too much of the time

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

no

[RileyH]

obviously

[Epic.]

Originally Posted by Daniel.

No, it has classic moments and great housemates but was boring too much of the time

[RileyH]

Steph and Megan

[Jake.]

no because it lasted a week too long

[Daniel.]

Most of cast were filler who added nothing

Having said that I would rate it third best C5 CBB

[Epic.]

Originally Posted by Daniel.

Most of cast were filler who added nothing

who

[Daniel.]

Most of them

[Epic.]

Originally Posted by Daniel.

Most of them

Nope, still don't know what you're talking about

[Daniel.]

Anyone who wasnt Tiffany, Megan, Gemma, Angie, John and Stephanie

Don’t reply with an essay pls

[Cal.]

Yeah my fave

[Greg!]

CBB19 was better but this was one of the greats

[RileyH]

Originally Posted by RobertC

Winston was a huge 1 week presence, Jonathan was a GC beta, Nancy had the messy first week, David didn't need to contribute much to be memorable, Kristina's loyalty to John is what had the temporary house divide at equal opposition, Christopher had the Gemma feud, Jeremy was why you listed Stephanie in the first place, Danniella was Gemma's right-hand partner and her love/hate thing with Stephanie was a huge aspect to the series, Darren had the weird Tiffany/John interactions that made him focused on sometimes, and Scotty had the Megan showmance, the most vocal thorn against Jezzanie, and the mini thing with Tiffany.

Wouldn't call that an essay . Just explaining the rest of the cast. Contributing "nothing" would be the likes of the majority of the CBB11 or CBB3 casts. 17 is far away from that estimate speaking on an objective level here.

okay this I don't agree with

[Epic.]

Originally Posted by RileyHollyoaks

okay this I don't agree with

Oh don't get me wrong. She contributed things other than the Jeremy stuff like her feuds with John, Gemma, and Danniella and her awful lack of cleaning up after herself being a prominent aspect but he was the main thing relating to her and by extension that would mean he objectively wasn't a "nothing"

[Jason.]

Absolutely not.

[Daniel.]

Originally Posted by RobertC

Winston was a huge 1 week presence, Jonathan was a GC beta, Nancy had the messy first week, David didn't need to contribute much to be memorable, Kristina's loyalty to John is what had the temporary house divide at equal opposition, Christopher had the Gemma feud, Jeremy was why you listed Stephanie in the first place, Danniella was Gemma's right-hand partner and her love/hate thing with Stephanie was a huge aspect to the series, Darren had the weird Tiffany/John interactions that made him focused on sometimes, and Scotty had the Megan showmance, the most vocal thorn against Jezzanie, and the mini thing with Tiffany.

Wouldn't call that an essay . Just explaining the rest of the cast. Contributing "nothing" would be the likes of the majority of the CBB11 or CBB3 casts. 17 is far away from that estimate speaking on an objective level here.

[Morgan.]

I put yes because I did love it but it'd be 10x better without Steph and Jezza

[RileyH]

Originally Posted by Blurryface

I put yes because I did love it but it'd be 10x better without Steph and Jezza

it's like you're trying to ruin it