Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano
Tbf, and tell me if I'm wrong.. but it sounds like you're suggesting there should be a job specifically for trans rights? (If theyre not covered under their preferred pronouns' rights.. cos like otherwise youre suggesting they shouldnt have anybody covering their rights?). And I'd agree, that would make more sense to me.
But idk what that has got to do with this person having that job - doesnt seem mutally exclusive to me. They got that job cos they were the best person for it.
|
Indeed. Transwomens issues are not really womens issues, and womens issues are not tranwomans issues. It is wrong to appoint a transwoman as basically a spokesperson for women. They are not the same, not even of the same sex.
It should be noted here, that this person passed up the LGBT officer job, specifically to go for the womens officer.
Threaded Mode