[jet]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Corbyn signed a motion condemning the IRA’s violence in 1994.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7761801.html

I have posted countless articles from different sources telling of his IRA involvement and all of them are discounted as made up nonsense. You post one that gives no proof of anything - why? Am I supposed to go 'OMG! I've been wrong!'. Come on!

It's so unlikely, as he has great difficulty even today condemning them outright:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiqEyxg9JM0

....and what has it got to do with his IRA involvement in the 70's and 80's, his lies about being a 'massive' part of the peace process, and the fact he refuses even now to condemn the IRA outright without his repeated bumblings of 'I condemn all bombings'.

Have a look at this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4OkUXwgt1M

And this:
Corbyn on Andrew Neil,
Andrew Neil: "We look at your record, and we can't find any evidence of you urging the IRA to put away it's guns and bombs" - his only defence being 'he was working for peace'. As that was a lie, everything else he says falls down:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj_I3Qs8nbs

There is NO proof anywhere that Corbyn was part of the peace process or had any part to play in the Good friday agreement. Can you at least admit that now? He never even met with the other side in the conflict. And what about him surrounding himself with his IRA supporter friends John McDonnell and Diane Abbot? What have you to say about that? If his apologists still can't see straight through his lies and BS, I feel sorry for them.