[Cal.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

well you were calling for a member to be outright banned for having a difference of opinion a minute ago and we have mods and a process for that so what does that make you?

NOT you comparing someone being transphobic to Jake wanting someone banned from a forum

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Cal.

NOT you comparing someone being transphobic to Jake wanting someone banned from a forum

Lol why are you shocked

[Vanessa]

So is Courtney a man or a woman? I still don't get it.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Cal.

NOT you comparing someone being transphobic to Jake wanting someone banned from a forum

in your opinion but as i said we have mods and a process we dont need members mini modding and undermining the mods, some posting in this thread

no matter how right he thinks his is...

[Cal.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

in your opinion but as i said we have mods and a process we dont need members mini modding and undermining the mods, some posting in this thread

no matter how right he thinks his is...

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Jake.

Lol why are you shocked

It's 2018 and it already feels like a rehash of CBB14 transphobia with Kellie. Nout changes here!

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Cal.

[Ant.]

Is it any surprise the trans community has high suicide rates when people spew awful close-minded comments as they do on here?

[Daniel-X]

Weird to think people are still so bothered in 2018, in 2007 with Sam it seemed dated but **** me get a life!

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

in your opinion but as i said we have mods and a process we dont need members mini modding and undermining the mods, some posting in this thread

no matter how right he thinks his is...

yeah that’s the same

“Undermining” the mods is exactly the same as being transphobic

You’re completely right

[Denver]

I was infracted for saying i thought a forum member was older then they were because it is apparently disrespectful yet Chuff is still on this site?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Are women of a certain age not women because they can't give birth? How about women who need to have surgeries or hysterectomies? Are they not women in your eyes?

Women are born with a womb and a reproduction system India was not and cannot buy one either so will NEVER be a woman ,even after the menopause or hysterectomy you are still a woman, what a stupid,ill informed comment to make and an nasty thing to say ,as women have had hysterectomies through cancer etc

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Women are born with a womb and a reproduction system India was not and cannot buy one either so will NEVER be a woman ,even after the menopause or hysterectomy you are still a woman, what a stupid,ill informed comment to make and an nasty thing to say ,as women have had hysterectomies through cancer etc

Hardly nasty chuff, plus I don't think you can really complain if someone does make a 'nasty' comment given the vile things you've been saying

[Oliver_W]

Even transphobes know the difference between drag queens and traps, what is India even on about?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

well you were calling for a member to be outright banned for having a difference of opinion a minute ago and we have mods and a process for that so what does that make you?

Double standards

[Cal.]

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Double standards

No it’s not. It’s really not.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Lilbro

Hardly nasty chuff, plus I don't think you can really complain if someone does make a 'nasty' comment given the vile things you've been saying

Claiming a woman who has lost her womb through illness is no longer a woman is a disgusting thing to say and if you can't see that ,I pity you I truly do

[Cal.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Claiming a woman who has lost her womb through illness is no longer a woman is a disgusting thing to say and if you can't see that ,I pity you I truly do

He didn't say that. He asked you if that's what YOU thought since you'd previously said a woman without a female reproductive system is not a woman, hence asking if YOU thought a woman who'd had a hysterectomy was not a woman.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Claiming a woman who has lost her womb through illness is no longer a woman is a disgusting thing to say and if you can't see that ,I pity you I truly do

Who “claimed” that?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Jake.

Who “claimed” that?

Read through the comments from last night and today and find them

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Read through the comments from last night and today and find them

Dezzy asked a question, he didn’t claim anything?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Women are born with a womb and a reproduction system India was not and cannot buy one either so will NEVER be a woman ,even after the menopause or hysterectomy you are still a woman, what a stupid,ill informed comment to make and an nasty thing to say ,as women have had hysterectomies through cancer etc

When did I make a statement that women who can't give birth or who don't have the organs to do so due to various circumstances don't count as women?

You made this flawed statement

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Neither of them will ever be a woman, they have no womb ,they cannot have a child so not a woman .... Simple !!

These are your words, I just asked for clarification, I'm not sure how that warrants such a vitriolic reaction from you? You stated that women who don't have the organs or cannot have children aren't women so I brought up those two examples in order to highlight the massive flaw in that statement, that you only count women as women on whether or not they can have children or not.

I think that's a grim way of thinking and it's detrimental to think of women as nothing more than baby factories but that's what you reduced them to in your definition of what makes a woman a woman in that post.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

When did I make a statement that women who can't give birth or who don't have the organs to do so due to various circumstances don't count as women?

You made this flawed statement



These are your words, I just asked for clarification, I'm not sure how that warrants such a vitriolic reaction from you? You stated that women who don't have the organs or cannot have children aren't women so I brought up those two examples in order to highlight the massive flaw in that statement, that you only count women as women on whether or not they can have children or not.

I think that's a grim way of thinking and it's detrimental to think of women as nothing more than baby factories but that's what you reduced them to in your definition of what makes a woman a woman in that post.

Ive seen you compare India to a woman who can no longer have children through medical reasons as the same, and they are not

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Ive seen you compare India to a woman who can no longer have children through medical reasons as the same, and they are not

I've not compared anything, all I've done is ask you a question.

You pretty much defined women by their ability to give birth, I'm just highlighting the fact that it's a flawed outlook because, by your criteria in that post, a woman that cannot give birth can't be considered a woman. I'm just giving you the opportunity to clarify what you have said.