Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro Sniper
Pathetic. Irreparably damaged her strong-likeable-straight as a die character with one yellow move. And her reasons for the 2 she did pick were just pathetic. But the face2face noms yet again proved a damp squib...as we got the usual piss weak reasons from the majority of them. That's why an after the fact playback of the noms is the better way to go. It's essentially the same thing but with more personal, harsher, honest reasons. For example, Rachel might still have nommed Jonny, but it would have been more interesting to hear more legit reasons than weak, "jovial" trash like "he's a temptation" .. as dummy Emma(presumably in there to encourage them to give valid reasons) just giggled along like a weak little girl with no clue.
|
Malika looked upset to have to nominate face to face and her tone showed that, she clearly hated being rushed to pick 2 names and i think she just randomly chose Ann & Andrew for the sake of it .But maybe she would of chosen Ann still who knows.
She couldn't decide who to pick whereas when they vote in the diary room they have ages to decide as it's not a live show where daft Emma is telling them "hurry up we'll go off air" or whatever crap she said . Plus having to nominate first made no sense either ! , i think they were trying to mess with Malika as they could see she was already in a scramble . Amanda should of Nominated first .
It's not fair how Malika had to give a detailed reason for voting for Ann , when Rachel gave a dumb invalid reason for nominating Johnny !!.
Plus she's married so why does she think it's ok to say he's a temptation. If Daniel said that about Ashley people would call him a perv!! i'm so sick of it

.