[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Whoever they are they don't seem to have very good timing, though it is improving

Hopefully next time they actually get into the living area as Emma goes live to the house and then chaos ensues

Why would you want that? it's no different to someone entering your home uninvited

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Why would you want that? it's no different to someone entering your home uninvited

because it would actually inject some brief life into this flailing series? So long as they're not dangerous (which these YouTubers clearly aren't) what's the problem? This is a television set not someone's private house ffs

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Jack_

because it would actually inject some brief life into this flailing series? So long as they're not dangerous (which these YouTubers clearly aren't) what's the problem? This is a television set not someone's private house ffs

It doesn't matter if it's a TV set, the HMs are supposed to be safely locked away, if they can get as far as the garden any nutter can get in unless you think only you tubers have the brains to get access

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Cherie

It doesn't matter if it's a TV set, the HMs are supposed to be safely locked away, if they can get as far as the garden any nutter can get in unless you think only you tubers have the brains to get access

Did you miss this post in another thread where I acknowledged their poor security?

Originally Posted by Jack_

Shame they're probably never going to show us what happens, Justin Waggott's antics all over again

On a serious note their security seems appalling?

I wasn't talking about 'any nutter', I was referring specifically to the two YouTubers who have already entered twice. See here:

Originally Posted by Jack_

Whoever they are they don't seem to have very good timing, though it is improving

Hopefully next time they actually get into the living area as Emma goes live to the house and then chaos ensues

Originally Posted by Jack_

because it would actually inject some brief life into this flailing series? So long as they're not dangerous (which these YouTubers clearly aren't) what's the problem? This is a television set not someone's private house ffs

I never said I wanted 'any nutter' to enter, in fact I hoped for the opposite. I was hoping that IF they got in again THEY actually make it into the house. You've taken 2 and 2 and made 5

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Did you miss this post in another thread where I acknowledged their poor security?



I wasn't talking about 'any nutter', I was referring specifically to the two YouTubers who have already entered twice. See here:





I never said I wanted 'any nutter' to enter, in fact I hoped for the opposite. I was hoping that IF they got in again THEY actually make it into the house. You've taken 2 and 2 and made 5

Oh as long as they are not dangerous that's aright them it's perfectly fine for the housemates to be scared even for a little while as long as it creates chaos for your viewing. ..okay

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Oh as long as they are not dangerous that's aright them it's perfectly fine for the housemates to be scared even for a little while as long as it creates chaos for your viewing. ..okay

Oh how melodramatic Cherie yes those poor souls being frightened by two harmless YouTubers breaking into the house for a few minutes just to get themselves on TV, get them a Xanax and an underground bunker quickly

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Oh how melodramatic Cherie yes those poor souls being frightened by two harmless YouTubers breaking into the house for a few minutes just to get themselves on TV, get them a Xanax and an underground bunker quickly

Surely the point is the HMs don't know who they are? or what their motive is? Not so long ago someone drove for hours to murder a shopkeeper who had wished his customers a Happy Easter on social media, I know it's an extreme but as the HMs don't know how they are being perceived on the outside or who will take issue with them, it's not beyond reasonable possibility someone could have a sinister motive