[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Like I'vve said twice in this thread, if you think it's okay to call a politician a terrorist sympathiser then you can't get all uppity about me calling a politician scum when it comes to a voting history of voting against the interests of the most vulnerable people in our society.

If you really have an issue with this, come talk to me over PM where there's no audience to perform for.

That is nothing to do with what is being asked. I just want an answer to this question as do others:

So in future, the rules are that if a politician or party is being discussed in a critical way, using inflammatory language, it isn't allowed to bring another into it for comparison purposes as they have no relevance and the people should just suck up the inflammatory language, is that right?
Sounds like a blog to me with the comments section closed.