[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Blurryface

He played one of th best games he was just faced with a bitter jury that were blind to that. And his Jury management was ****e too.

Jury management is important and part of the game play so he didn't really play a good game.

The jury were not bitter.

[Morgan.]

Originally Posted by LukeB

Jury management is important and part of the game play so he didn't really play a good game.

The jury were not bitter.

His actual game was good, winning comps when he needed and removing threats. It was just that portion of Jury that he failed in.

And the Jury were bitter. Even Shannon, one of the biggest BB Superfans there is, said that no matter who he was sat next to she wouldn't vote Ross because of how he played.

Despite me not even wanting Ross to win, remember, I do think that she is a bitter juror as she is letting her experience influence her vote.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Blurryface

I do think that she is a bitter juror as she is letting her experience influence her vote.

what the hell else is she supposed to let influence her vote?????

[Morgan.]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

what the hell else is she supposed to let influence her vote?????

She is supposed to look at the game and the bigger picture, and look how people played it, then vote for who played it best. I loved Marissa and wanted her to win but she did not have a better game than Ross.

[Epic.]

Originally Posted by Blurryface

She is supposed to look at the game and the bigger picture, and look how people played it, then vote for who played it best. I loved Marissa and wanted her to win but she did not have a better game than Ross.

But Shannon still thought Ross played the 'game' in question too dirty sometimes, which he did.

[Morgan.]

Originally Posted by Epic.

But Shannon still thought Ross played the 'game' in question too dirty sometimes, which he did.

You can argue that previous winners under this format, for example BBCAN5 Kevin, played the game very dirty and still won.

Idk I'm tired and probably not making any sense in anything rn

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Blurryface

You can argue that previous winners under this format, for example BBCAN5 Kevin, played the game very dirty and still won.

Idk I'm tired and probably not making any sense in anything rn

Kevin had a better social game than Karen. Anyone would have won against Karen in that top 4.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Blurryface

His actual game was good, winning comps when he needed and removing threats. It was just that portion of Jury that he failed in.

And the Jury were bitter. Even Shannon, one of the biggest BB Superfans there is, said that no matter who he was sat next to she wouldn't vote Ross because of how he played.

Despite me not even wanting Ross to win, remember, I do think that she is a bitter juror as she is letting her experience influence her vote.

There's much more to the game than winning comps and removing threats, it's the way you do it and manage the jury. The jury got to watch so it may have been different if they couldn't. No one was bitter, he failed with his jury management and that's his fault. His game has already been done before and they won but he was against trash so ofc he would win.

[Morgan.]

Originally Posted by LukeB

There's much more to the game than winning comps and removing threats, it's the way you do it and manage the jury. The jury got to watch so it may have been different if they couldn't. No one was bitter, he failed with his jury management and that's his fault. His game has already been done before and they won but he was against trash so ofc he would win.

I think most of the Jury said they didn't watch, like, any or the prior episodes or the latter episodes

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Blurryface

I think most of the Jury said they didn't watch, like, any or the prior episodes or the latter episodes

then the last impression of Ross was not good?

This is how Paul lost twice!