[DemolitionRed]

So now we have 23 British diplomats expelled from Russia with further threats from May and Putin.

The Chemical Weapons Act page 9, section 2, clearly states that evidence (as proof) must be available, so how is May refusing the Russian embassy requests to collect evidence?

[bots]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

So now we have 23 British diplomats expelled from Russia with further threats from May and Putin.

The Chemical Weapons Act page 9, section 2, clearly states that evidence (as proof) must be available, so how is May refusing the Russian embassy requests to collect evidence?

Genuine question here DR, why are you so keen to see things from a Russian perspective, when its UK citizens that have been attacked?

I lived and worked in Russia, have many good Russian friends, but I still side with the UK in the face of an outrageous attack

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Genuine question here DR, why are you so keen to see things from a Russian perspective, when its UK citizens that have been attacked?

I lived and worked in Russia, have many good Russian friends, but I still side with the UK in the face of an outrageous attack

Good question

1) I want to see things from all sides and not be blinded by the one sided hysteria.

2) I'm not going to roll over and believe everything that's said. I can't because different papers are saying different things. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/13/w...ist/index.html Some papers are asking why there weren't further investigations and asking why Russia is being refused evidence whilst others are riding on the back of patriotism and saying May was absolutely right.

3) As I'm not the only person asking these questions (there's a lot of us) we don't see it as siding with Britain or Russia, we see it as an open and frank discussion with all questions answered.