| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Labour used this during the 2017 GE, didn’t some people on here get Facebook messages, I think it might have been you that said it Kizzy
![]() http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-40209711
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
Last edited by Cherie; 21-03-2018 at 05:15 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
The chatter was happening in big groups - many of them filled with Jeremy Corbyn's most dedicated supporters, and closed to the general public. It was reflected in lists of most-shared stories, which were dominated by material sympathetic to Labour and hostile towards Theresa May's Conservatives. Of course, we can't be sure of how social media shares shape actual voting - and there isn't yet any hard evidence that what people saw on Facebook or any other social network was the decisive factor that swayed huge numbers of votes. We'll have to wait days, weeks or longer for a full analysis to emerge. But what was clear online was a distinct surge in pro-Corbyn enthusiasm, in contrast with a professional and increasingly microtargeted Conservative advertising strategy. I did see support for Corbyn on FB yes... from people, groups and organisations not bots and spam, did you even bother to read this article?
__________________
Last edited by Kizzy; 22-03-2018 at 07:52 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
[QUOTE=Kizzy;9927572]'The Conservative focus seemed to be sharp, paid-for attack ads. Labour's presence was much more organic, and perhaps more effective with it.
The chatter was happening in big groups - many of them filled with Jeremy Corbyn's most dedicated supporters, and closed to the general public. It was reflected in lists of most-shared stories, which were dominated by material sympathetic to Labour and hostile towards Theresa May's Conservatives. Of course, we can't be sure of how social media shares shape actual voting - and there isn't yet any hard evidence that what people saw on Facebook or any other social network was the decisive factor that swayed huge numbers of votes. We'll have to wait days, weeks or longer for a full analysis to emerge. But what was clear online was a distinct surge in pro-Corbyn enthusiasm, in contrast with a professional and increasingly microtargeted Conservative advertising strategy. I did see support for Corbyn on FB yes... from people, groups and organisations not bots and spam, did you even bother to read this article?[/QUOTE] No I didn't, what I don't get is why people are so surprised that their politcal leanings are being harvested and not just by one party
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
Cherie you are not understanding, the methodology is different.. harvesting data via mining posts and personal information is different from setting up a facebook group to discuss your disillusionment of the current govt and support of a candidate in a GE.
__________________
Last edited by Kizzy; 22-03-2018 at 03:10 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
what are you talking about? I never mentioned anything about facebook groups
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
Likes cars that go boom
|
You posted the article you said referred to the point you were making.... nowhere in that article does it substantiate what you inferred, that Labour targeted voters via data mining :/
__________________
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|