[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Then you are opposed to Human Rights, that's the long and short of it.

Human Rights for everyone or Human Rights for no one, you can't pick and choose.

Which Human Rights would be violated by not bring IS terrorists here?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Which Human Rights would be violated by not bring IS terrorists here?

I'm interested in the response to this also

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Which Human Rights would be violated by not bring IS terrorists here?

I'll refer you back to my previous reply to a similar question you asked.

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I brought up the human rights angle, not in response to this case but to the worrying fantasising and bloodlust of people who hope for executions without due course without realising that it's an attitude that's common with the enemy.

My view on this pair has not changed. I believe British criminals should face a British court of law for their crimes, it's what I've said for other crimes when they've been discussed on here and it would be hypocritical for me to deviate from that point of view and make exceptions in this case. I'd rather terrorists face life imprisonment and be seen as a failure by their peers than be made martyrs through execution.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I'll refer you back to my previous reply to a similar question you asked.

So nothing particular then. Your apparent love of Human Rights is incidental to you thinking they should be tried in the UK. Gotcha.