[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

In this country the person who reports a murder is a suspect.

You make it sound like that's a crazy idea, but it depends on the situation. Statistically people being harmed (whatever form of violence) are harmed by people they know or are related to. It would be negligent for anyone investigating a crime to not start at the beginning and work with the information they've got.

If I reported my gf missing, I would fully expect to be their initial suspect. Investigations have to start somewhere, and starting with the last person to see or speak to the missing person is exactly where I'd want the police to start looking.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

You make it sound like that's a crazy idea, but it depends on the situation. Statistically people being harmed (whatever form of violence) are harmed by people they know or are related to. It would be negligent for anyone investigating a crime to not start at the beginning and work with the information they've got.

If I reported my gf missing, I would fully expect to be their initial suspect. Investigations have to start somewhere, and starting with the last person to see or speak to the missing person is exactly where I'd want the police to start looking.

No it's the right idea to look at those reporting the crime, why has the uk police not looked st the parents as suspects.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

No it's the right idea to look at those reporting the crime, why has the uk police not looked st the parents as suspects.

Ahh sorry my mistake. I misunderstood what you meant.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

In this country the person who reports a murder is a suspect.

What a facetious comment.

They didn't report a crime, a tragedy occurred because of their own criminal neglectful actions.

[bitontheslide]

All we know with certainty is that it is a case of a missing child. There is no evidence of abduction, so why are the parents always excluded as being potential killers or at a minimum complicit in obstruction of justice. If a case is being reviewed, all aspects should be included in the review. Starting the review with .... the parents didn't do it, is not respecting the missing child.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

What a facetious comment.

They didn't report a crime, a tragedy occurred because of their own criminal neglectful actions.

Go troll lt, stop trying to knock me as a person.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Go troll lt, stop trying to knock me as a person.

Are you Gerry McCann?

If not, what the hell are you on about?

If you only want people agreeing with you you're in the wrong place.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

All we know with certainty is that it is a case of a missing child. There is no evidence of abduction, so why are the parents always excluded as being potential killers or at a minimum complicit in obstruction of justice. If a case is being reviewed, all aspects should be included in the review. Starting the review with .... the parents didn't do it, is not respecting the missing child.

Exactly

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Are you Gerry McCann?

If not, what the hell are you on about?

If you only want people agreeing with you you're in the wrong place.

true, we can all have our own opinion

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

true, we can all have our own opinion

You can do one as well. You flip flop.

[Jamie89]

Youtube video

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Jamie89

Youtube video

Why not Kate? Hhhmmm