[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Cherie

technically Phil didn't do anything wrong, the advertisers thought otherwise and he is toast

Plenty of things which are legal are wrong - such as grooming a teenager, and sleeping with him while he's still a child.

Phil was obviously careful to visibly stay within the letter of the law, but whether or not he did anything wrong is apparently open to interpretation.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

A prisoner in your own home

I am in Spain for half the year, hardly

[Alf]

[Crimson Dynamo]

how has a 20-year-old crack addict hired a top legal team?

are we all daft?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I am in Spain for half the year, hardly

Ok Charlie big bollox

It’s a different story when your in that courtroom

And for people that don’t know

Most people are in court for

Council tax debt
No Tv license
No Fishing lincence

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

how has a 20-year-old crack addict hired a top legal team?

are we all daft?

The same way phils young lover had a top lawyer

And yes you are daft as a brush

[Crimson Dynamo]

[Crimson Dynamo]

did the teen even know who the perp was

17 year olds dont watch bbc news?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Ok Charlie big bollox

It’s a different story when your in that courtroom

And for people that don’t know

Most people are in court for

Council tax debt
No Tv license
No Fishing lincence

I believe it, always go after the easy targets

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

uh oh, don't think this is over by a long chalk, doesn't look like the parents are about to back down and who can blame them

[bots]

If the Sun have any evidence to back up the allegations, then this could go to a whole new level. It becomes a criminal case automatically if the alleged perp used coercion to try and shut the story down. It looks very like that is what has just gone down

[Crimson Dynamo]

GB news state parents are standing by their claims

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

did the teen even know who the perp was

17 year olds dont watch bbc news?

Meh, he might know the presenter as "that bloke mum watches on the news while I scroll through" ... Insta/TikTok/Twitter/Face-one-that-kids-don't-use

[Crimson Dynamo]

[Crimson Dynamo]

Presenter story marked by 'dangerous absence of facts', says ex-BBC executive
A former BBC news executive has claimed that a story alleging a presenter paid a teenager for sexual photos has a “dangerous absence of facts”.

Tim Luckhurst told the broadcaster: “This story has been marked from the beginning by a dangerous absence of facts, at every stage there have been more questions than answers and that remains the case tonight.

“The emphasis has shifted - now it seems that the parents may have raised concerns with The Sun concerns which did not directly reflect the concerns of their child.

“But at no stage in this story have we seen the full details that The Sun purports to have.

“I am beginning to suspect that the problem is that the facts are not entirely clear to The Sun, they’re not clear to the BBC either.”

[user104658]

My purely speculative speculation would be;

It happened as described

He didn't want to report it

Mum reported it

He's being paid to deny the whole thing.


Mess

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Cherie

and they wonder why the mother didn't go to the police

technically Phil didn't do anything wrong, the advertisers thought otherwise and he is toast

I will be cancelling my DD off the back of this, fed up of paying paedo wages

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Unless you disconnect your tv Ariel , you will be liable for prosecution

Taken to court and given a criminal record.

Originally Posted by Cherie

they will have to get me to answer the door first

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

A prisoner in your own home

Not that I'd ever encourage illegal activity and of course anyone who watches live telly should have a license until they're abolished...

But...

I don't have a TV license (legitimately - we don't watch live TV or have a sky disk/aerial etc plugged in) and haven't had one for about 5 or 6 years now.

Like I said, it's legitimate - we don't watch live TV, just streaming and gaming in this house. HOWEVER... No one has ever checked. Not ever. Not a sniff.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

My purely speculative speculation would be;

It happened as described

He didn't want to report it

Mum reported it

He's being paid to deny the whole thing.


Mess

that's what i think, it's not a small time lawyer that is representing the kid. It really stinks pretty bad

[AnnieK]

I've not had a TV licence for years.....never had a knock at the door, or even a letter.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

I've not had a TV licence for years.....never had a knock at the door, or even a letter.

same

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

I've not had a TV licence for years.....never had a knock at the door, or even a letter.

Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

that is such a fake news view

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Well if they have, they're literally years out of date. Like I said, it's been years and I've never even had as much as an email or letter, let alone a visit from a radar van. Something like 1% end up in court, I'll take my chances.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

When my son moved into his flat, he kept getting notices, in BIG RED LETTERS, we are coming, DONT IGNORE, he just binned them, no one ever came, 5 years in now ...

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

They have records of which addresses have a license. They definitely do not have "radar vans" . Completely debunked as a myth. They have to come into your house and physically check, and you don't need one just have a TV, it has to be being used to watch old-fashioned outdated live boomer TV.