About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

user104658 · 11-07-2023, 07:54 AM

Hmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

bots · 11-07-2023, 08:03 AM

the young person is an addict with a drug habit to fund. They haven't stopped being an addict, and he has a bloke willing to fund the habit. Why would they speak against that and destroy the good thing they are on. I bet he/she is seriously pissed at the mum for trying to stop it. The person is 20 years old, the mother has no rights.

That's more than likely the situation as it stands.

It's a completely separate issue that a bbc presenter was behaving in an inappropriate way

Oliver_W · 11-07-2023, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Hmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

Yup, and it wasn't grooming in any way unless he explicity says the words "I was groomed" !!1

Cherie · 11-07-2023, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Hmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

That didn't really work for Schofield did it, the kid was of age when they entered relations ....

Cherie · 11-07-2023, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

It’s not rocket science

There isn’t the evidence to back up the claim

The Sun says it has evidence? bank statements are pretty concrete, unless he paid in cash up to age 18

At any rate he should be sacked for bringing the BBC into disrepute, and lets see if the kid really is an ex employee as suggested this morning by someone being interviewed by Kay Burley

Crimson Dynamo · 11-07-2023, 08:17 AM

parents say they have screenshots, bank statements and messages so that would be what they showed the Sun. The BBC suspended the person based on "new evidence"

SO there is plenty of evidence afoot it would appear

Oliver_W · 11-07-2023, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie

That didn't really work for Schofield did it, the kid was of age when they entered relations ....

If the accusation that the photos were purchased and taken when the kid was seventeen, then it's a crime. But it's not a crime for letches to have ("consensual") sex with sixteen year olds.

Cherie · 11-07-2023, 08:18 AM

ue

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Hmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

They have already been to the police

Personally I don't blame them for pursueing this, 17/18, they are the ones picking up the pieces of an addict not the accused

Cherie · 11-07-2023, 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

parents say they have screenshots, bank statements and messages so that would be what they showed the Sun. The BBC suspended the person based on "new evidence"

SO there is plenty of evidence afoot it would appear

good point, why suspend if nothing to see here

thesheriff443 · 11-07-2023, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Hmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

Having no morals Isn’t a crime

Betting shops taking away kids food shopping money because the dad has a betting addiction , remember those days when that’s we’re your wage come from!

So give it a rest with the moral high ground bollox

Cherie · 11-07-2023, 08:26 AM

Also if the video of the accused in his pants is the BBC sofa then.......bringing your fetish to work day is not a thing as far as I know

bots · 11-07-2023, 08:33 AM

i thought it was mentioned somewhere that they were paid via paypal

Cherie · 11-07-2023, 08:41 AM

The stepdad of a youngster at the heart of a sex picture scandal involving a BBC presenter claims police told the family they "couldn't do anything".

The family claim the young person, who is now 20, was communicating with a top Beeb star for three years. However, he says when they initially reported concerns to police officers, they said there was nothing they could do.

The revelation comes after The Sun claimed the big-name BBC host had allegedly paid over £35,000 to the youngster for explicit pictures. Their mother says this money was used to fund a crack habit.

Speaking to the newspaper, the stepdad claimed the family only contacted the BBC initially because they wanted to cash payments to stop. This they said would "save" their vulnerable addict child.

The stepdad said: "I told the BBC I had gone to the police in desperation but they couldn't do anything as they said it wasn't illegal. They knew all of this."

He also said the money did not stop, adding: "I don't even think they spoke to him."

On Monday, July 10, BBC bosses and the Metropolitan Police held a meeting to look at information about the exchange between the youngster and the star.

The Metropolitan Police has said it is assessing the information discussed at the meeting and further enquiries are taking place to establish whether there is evidence of a criminal offence having been committed.

The Express

Crimson Dynamo · 11-07-2023, 08:48 AM

user104658 · 11-07-2023, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Having no morals Isn’t a crime

Betting shops taking away kids food shopping money because the dad has a betting addiction, remember those days when that’s we’re your wage come from!

So give it a rest with the moral high ground bollox

I didn't say it was a crime - I'm not saying that there should be police involvement or that he should go to jail.

I'm also well aware that bookies are cess pits, there's a reason I studied & left

. Unfortunately at the time, my own kid's food on the table came before the punter's kids.

I don't think the BBC presenter needed to ogle a young lad's cock in order to make a living

. I mean maybe, but it seems quite unlikely!

user104658 · 11-07-2023, 08:57 AM

Tell you one thing that doesn't add up - £35000 on crack over three years. People do crack specifically because it's a cheaper high.

I reckon it was probably regular ol' cocaine. Sometimes people think they're the same thing, maybe his parents are saying "crack" but it's not actually crack.

I mean it's certainly possible but a £12000-a-year crack habit is a HEAVY habit...

Parmy · 11-07-2023, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie

Also if the video of the accused in his pants is the BBC sofa then.......bringing your fetish to work day is not a thing as far as I know

It worked for frank bough

arista · 11-07-2023, 10:13 AM

Great News if this happens
A Conservative MP may name the Dirty Bugger presenter
LIVE in Parliament

arista · 11-07-2023, 10:20 AM

Crimson Dynamo · 11-07-2023, 10:22 AM

What would be the motivation for the young kid to get a lawyer anyroad?

bots · 11-07-2023, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

What would be the motivation for the young kid to get a lawyer anyroad?

Given that there is no apparent legal jeopardy for any party, it is a bit odd. He isn't intending to sue anyone, so he is paying a lawyer for nothing.

The lawyers letter said the parent spoke rubbish. Thats a very legal term indeed

Also, it would have cost the kid at least 1k for the lawyer to send that letter, probably a lot more

Crimson Dynamo · 11-07-2023, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Given that there is no apparent legal jeopardy for any party, it is a bit odd. He isn't intending to sue anyone, so he is paying a lawyer for nothing.

The lawyers letter said the parent spoke rubbish. Thats a very legal term indeed

Also, it would have cost the kid at least 1k for the lawyer to send that letter, probably a lot more

They charge £725 per hour