[Stacey.]

[Stu]

For once can you stop speaking in black and white legal jargon and respect the fact that there is no evidence to suggest he has an ongoing sexual attraction to young children?

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by Judas Iscariot

For once can you stop speaking in black and white legal jargon and respect the fact that there is no evidence to suggest he has an ongoing sexual attraction to young children?

Does that mean you accept the 'fact' that he could be classed as a paedophile or are you just changing the goalposts in the discussion?

[informer]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Does that mean you accept the 'fact' that he could be classed as a paedophile or are you just changing the goalposts in the discussion?

I think it's quite clear by your fascination with paedophile's its in fact YOU who is a deeply troubled person..seek medical assistance you dirty peasant

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by informer

I think it's quite clear by your fascination with paedophile's its in fact YOU who is a deeply troubled person..seek medical assistance you dirty peasant

You know if it was anyone on the forum other than you, I may have been insulted by that slur.

Just to let you know my service pension keeps me comfortably off thanks.

[Stu]

Stop trying to catch me out and cop on. I'm talking about rational, common sense view and you know it. Not political technicalities.

There is no evidence to suggest he has an ongoing facination with kiddies.