[arista]

He is Live on Ch4 News now

[arista]

He is Not of a Sound Mind at all.
he just said we have Laws of The Heart up here in Nottingham.

He is a Nutter
just because he thinks he did the best thing
does not make This Legal.
He does not want the Law Changed,
he just wants to get away with his own Murder.

The BBC need to sack him fast.

[ElProximo]

You have to look at it this way - he is seen as a real authentic advocate for gay rights and this 'young man' who he was with (and may have given AIDS?) is dying slowly.
Maybe TOO slowly for Goslings liking.
Gosling simply cannot leave him. It would ruin his reputation and career.
How long might this young man have lived?
Possibly another year or more?
This is a full year where Gosling is, in effect, not allowed any more young 'bottoms', absolutely no orgies or 'glory holes' as the gays say it.
MAYBE he can have anonymous gay sex in some public park toilets.. but even that is risky and would look worse if caught cheating that way.
So?
Snuff the life out of this young man, collect all the praises and get massive credibility for gay rights, AIDS orgs and of course for 'staying by his side to the end',
and,
a few weeks later its back to the coke-filled toilet sex with new non-infected young men.

The cops better get on this now and start asking some tough questions.
I assume that Gosling will immediately cry 'Gay-bashing' at being questioned and quickly try and turn this around as himself being 'victimized by homophobics',
but,
the cops simply have to ignore that and investigate and question him no differently than if he was a skinhead or upper class mother or uni student.. all the same and no different.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

You have to look at it this way - he is seen as a real authentic advocate for gay rights and this 'young man' who he was with (and may have given AIDS?) is dying slowly.
Maybe TOO slowly for Goslings liking.
Gosling simply cannot leave him. It would ruin his reputation and career.
How long might this young man have lived?
Possibly another year or more?
This is a full year where Gosling is, in effect, not allowed any more young 'bottoms', absolutely no orgies or 'glory holes' as the gays say it.
MAYBE he can have anonymous gay sex in some public park toilets.. but even that is risky and would look worse if caught cheating that way.
So?
Snuff the life out of this young man, collect all the praises and get massive credibility for gay rights, AIDS orgs and of course for 'staying by his side to the end',
and,
a few weeks later its back to the coke-filled toilet sex with new non-infected young men.

The cops better get on this now and start asking some tough questions.
I assume that Gosling will immediately cry 'Gay-bashing' at being questioned and quickly try and turn this around as himself being 'victimized by homophobics',
but,
the cops simply have to ignore that and investigate and question him no differently than if he was a skinhead or upper class mother or uni student.. all the same and no different.

This is the problem with this insidious new liberal craze

[arista]

He has now Been Arrested by Police.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ring-Aids.html



The BBC North Inside Out docu'
and he broke BBC rules.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by arista

He has now Been Arrested by Police.

Some have him hung, drawn and quatered without even knowing all the facts! Innocent until proven guilty - is that an expression that some on here are not at all familiar with!

[arista]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

Some have him hung, drawn and quatered without even knowing all the facts! Innocent until proven guilty - is that an expression that some on here are not at all familiar with!

The BBC need to Sack him now.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

this guy is a murderer.

[bananarama]

Originally Posted by arista

This one Law in the UK
will never change.

Your probably right our MP's are more interested in passing laws to slaughter the unborn than passing laws to save from suffering.......

I have a lot of sympathy for those that might assist a willing person who has had enough and wants to end it.......

This radio guy however refers to him as a bit on the side.......No proof that the victim wanted his life ended........

Under such circumstances he has laid himself wide open to be charged with murder and to serve a long jail sentence........

Latest news this morning is that he has been arrested.........

[arista]

Just Reported on Ch4 News Live

The Bloated BBC that made that Docu'
has not handed the Police the Video of him saying how he killed
his (Bit On The Side) younger lover.

The Poxy BBC say the Police must get a Court Order.


The BBC Executive of this show
should be removed
for not knowing what was going to be shown.

[Shaun]

Wow. I agree with WOMBAI.

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

You would hope I was on the jury if you were the murdered mans parents or family and friends,
but,
Actually police do have to investigate that possibility. They will also investigate his claim it was an act of desperate 'mercy killing' to.

I'd be worried about you investigating crimes and accepting his story because you feel he is gay and cannot be wrong.
Or would you?

No, that is all in your head, because you are homophobic and feel the need to remind us that you are every time you post it seems. Wombai never even referred to the fact he was gay. You pulled that one out of your ass.

[Stu]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

killing is killing. he has No right to be God.

So are you against healthcare as a whole? After all, isn't that playing God too?

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

No, that is all in your head, because you are homophobic and feel the need to remind us that you are every time you post it seems. Wombai never even referred to the fact he was gay. You pulled that one out of your ass.

BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

You can't put words in people's mouths - saying they supported someone because the person is gay, when they never mentioned about them being gay. That is simply an assumption - which rather invalidates your point!

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Judas Iscariot

So are you against healthcare as a whole? After all, isn't that playing God too?

Only Boots and certain branches of Semi Chem

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

You can't put words in people's mouths - saying they supported someone because the person is gay, when they never mentioned about them being gay. That is simply an assumption - which rather invalidates your point!

No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.

So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.

So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.

Sounds like you are every '...ist' going! Anti gay, anti women, anti anyone different from you!

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.

So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.

Your comments were based on assumptions - not facts - simple as! And your assumptions were wrong, therefore so was your point! Who has it 'double-wrong' now then? Just your wee male brain pulling off another dumb moment!

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

Your comments were based on assumptions - not facts - simple as! And your assumptions were wrong, therefore so was your point! Who has it 'double-wrong' now then? Just your wee male brain pulling off another dumb moment!

No, that is not correct.
The 'point' depended on my assumptions regardless of whether they were correct or not.
To try and simplify it for you - 'I would be afraid if...(proposal that might happen)... point.

I know.. I have absolutely no doubt your brain is just freaking out right now but can I just give you some advice:
- Don't try to think this through any further.
Just accept it or not but just move on.
Trust me.

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

Sounds like you are every '...ist' going! Anti gay, anti women, anti anyone different from you!

It sounds like that?
Why should it 'sound' like that to you?
Because I am for equal rights and responsibilities and justice for people regardless of whether they are gay or not?
That 'sounds like' someone being 'antigay' to you?
Once again.. certain kind of brain can do that and oh well.

Women?
No no, I love women so much I often give them orgasms. That makes me feel happy too.

but here again.. suppose I was an 'ist' for one thing.
Why should I be an 'ist' for another?
Is that how simple and narrow-minded you have to see things or what?
Why can't I be racist against certain disappointing peoples and be in favour of others?
Maybe I dislike gays but I am all for lesbians?

You need to open your mind and stop thinking in this one small squirrely ball of confusion.
The world is more than just 'pink or blue' either/or.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

No, that is not correct.
The 'point' depended on my assumptions regardless of whether they were correct or not.
To try and simplify it for you - 'I would be afraid if...(proposal that might happen)... point.

I know.. I have absolutely no doubt your brain is just freaking out right now but can I just give you some advice:
- Don't try to think this through any further.
Just accept it or not but just move on.
Trust me.

If you mean by 'freaking out' - laughing myself silly - then got it in one! No I don't think I will even try to unmangle your messed up thought processes - as I don't think the end result will be worth the effort somehow! Trust you - I think not!

[Beastie]

Part time Lover.

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

If you are, then I'm lost for words. Why do you resent the people who have changed the law to give us the same rights as everyone else?

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

If you are, then I'm lost for words. Why do you resent the people who have changed the law to give us the same rights as everyone else?

We already had the exact same rights before and after (regardless of whether you talk UK or Canada or USA where some states tried this).

One adult man had every right to marry one adult woman (I know more conditions apply) and that was the same for you, me or anyone else. There was 100% equal standards for all.