[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Omah

Obviously not, but the worst offenders in the UK will be traced and arrested .....

Anyone who finds humour in the terrible death or abuse of a child in particular has to have a screw loose and to purposely go onto this childs memorial site and spout profanaties deserves everything he gets,the families suffer enough,Why can't this moron find something constructive to do with his time.I'm glad he has been caught and dealt with.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

well this isnt gonna go down well but i think hes hot

[CaraRawr]

a tad ott but the guy sounds like a ***** so glad he got what he deserved.

[BB_Eye]

This is a ridiculous sentence considering all the chav scum who get away with terrorising estates for years on end with a slap on the wrist.

Pathetic, it's not even an IRL crime.

Why in the Hell are the police wasting valuable time on crap like this?

[Omah]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

This is a ridiculous sentence considering all the chav scum who get away with terrorising estates for years on end with a slap on the wrist.

Pathetic, it's not even an IRL crime.

Why in the Hell are the police wasting valuable time on crap like this?

Because they are obliged to :

Unemployed Coss was only caught when he sent residents on his street photos of himself saying he was an internet "troll".

One of the residents passed the photos to police who interviewed him before he eventually admitted to posting abusive messages.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...ester-11650593

127 Improper use of public electronic communications network

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or

(b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/127

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by Omah

Because they are obliged to :



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...ester-11650593



http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/127

I'm not saying he shouldn't have been prosecuted. Just that a custodial sentence is harsh to say the least when people like this... get away with a suspended sentence.

[Omah]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

I'm not saying he shouldn't have been prosecuted. Just that a custodial sentence is harsh to say the least when people like this... get away with a suspended sentence.

Well, the "thug" should have been banged up for several years with some hairy-backed knuckle-draggers serving life - no remission, no remorse .....

[cupid stunt]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

I'm not saying he shouldn't have been prosecuted. Just that a custodial sentence is harsh to say the least when people like this... get away with a suspended sentence.

dont forget these 3 evil ******s as well

A family has reacted with horror and disbelief after a gang of teenage thugs who subjected an autistic boy to a terrifying three-day ‘torture’ ordeal walked free from court.

The gang used a mobile phone to film themselves carrying out depraved assaults on their 17-year-old victim.

During a sickening spree of violence the three thugs kicked and stamped on his head, repeatedly punched him in the chest, beat him with a tennis racket and then threw him down a steep embankment.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz15CVlQ6qz

those sick bastards should get tortured every day for the rest of their lives

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by cupid stunt

dont forget these 3 evil ******s as well

those sick bastards should get tortured every day for the rest of their lives

Yeah I heard about this too. I assumed it happened in America at first with how corrupt their legal system is. 80 hours community service and 12 months probation for torturing and sexually assaulting a minor?

Incomprehensible. Thankfully a petition is underway to change the decision. I hope there are serious consequences for the judge and defence barrister responsible for this.

[M X]

I don't think 18 weeks is long enough for that ******!

[Tom]

yeah, I understood that bit. But where did I compare it to paedophiles on the internet?

[Omah]

Originally Posted by Tom

yeah, I understood that bit. But where did I compare it to paedophiles on the internet?

You didn't and I didn't say you did - you accused me of making comparisons, which I had not - you had suggested that prosecuting for internet "crime" is pointless while I queried whether, in your opinion, paedophiles should therefore be "left to it" - you then made a legal comparison between rape and an internet troll .....

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Omah

You didn't and I didn't say you did - you accused me of making comparisons, which I had not - you had suggested that prosecuting for internet "crime" is pointless while I queried whether, in your opinion, paedophiles should therefore be "left to it" - you then made a legal comparison between rape and an internet troll .....

Yeah you might wanna read the thread again, I get a completely different account to that

You suggested that internet paedophiles should be left to it based on what my post said, but I did go on to say its completely different, besides internet trolling doesn't affect lives in the way that internet paedophilia does. And internet trolling tends to stay on the internet, the other doesn't. In fairness you can imply it from my post it you're being picky but realistically its 2 completely different matters and its like comparing death by dangerous driving with driving without insurance.

You went on to say I made initial comparisons (assuming its about trolling vs paedophillia beacuse of the post you quoted) and I didn't make any comparison at all and then said about the unrelaetd one. Thats what I'm asking you to find, otherwise you need to be clearer when you put your points across or just admit you were wrong to save you having to buy a new shovel

[Omah]

Originally Posted by Tom

Yeah you might wanna read the thread again, I get a completely different account to that

You suggested that internet paedophiles should be left to it based on what my post said, but I did go on to say its completely different, besides internet trolling doesn't affect lives in the way that internet paedophilia does. And internet trolling tends to stay on the internet, the other doesn't. In fairness you can imply it from my post it you're being picky but realistically its 2 completely different matters and its like comparing death by dangerous driving with driving without insurance.

You went on to say I made initial comparisons (assuming its about trolling vs paedophillia beacuse of the post you quoted) and I didn't make any comparison at all and then said about the unrelaetd one. Thats what I'm asking you to find, otherwise you need to be clearer when you put your points across or just admit you were wrong to save you having to buy a new shovel

I beg to differ ..... we appear to have irreconcilable perceptions .....

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Omah

I beg to differ ..... we appear to have irreconcilable perceptions .....

That different that you quote the entirely wrong post

[BB_Eye]

Once of you must be trolling. Now behave before I call the coppers.