[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Valdora

But that's the problem. Only 2 million watched the celebrity series. Better than 1 million though.

That's not bad for C5 though is it?

[Valdora]

True. I just find it funny that we have gone from Stallones ex wifes and family to Hasslehoffs Ex Wive and co star.

[Callum]

5/10, not really excited but I always prefer normal BB's, more weeks and more action.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Valdora

True. I just find it funny that we have gone from Stallones ex wifes and family to Hasslehoffs Ex Wive and co star.

lol, yeah but C5 were always going to have a bit of an uphill struggle with BB, between the way the shows ratings and interest has dropped over the years and moving to a less popular channel.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Shusssht woman people on here think I am heartless. I dont want it to be known there is actually a decent streak within me.

Anyways I felt a bit sorry for you, have never heard of anyone having the whole A-Z used by the STD clincis, its not a menu you know.

Husssshhh little man. He doth protest too much.

Get with it ya old scutter. STD clinics are from yesteryear. It's GUM clincs now. Stop pretending you don't know, hell, if it wasn't for you, the ones in the Riveria would go bust.

BOT.

There has got to be some evil twist to Pammy girl going in - the old playing up on the sexpot thing last night..... I wonder what surprise BB has in store, but it's certainly going to be interesting seeing the reaction when the newbies enter the house tonight!!

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Valdora

True. I just find it funny that we have gone from Stallones ex wifes and family to Hasslehoffs Ex Wive and co star.

God that's so true. When you consider the real Celebs that have been in the house. Jackie Stallone, Brigette Neilson (sp), some of the Jacksons, Alec Baldwin, Vinnie Jones etc : I think the show has lost it's oomph..... as well as the celebs now being wise to how badly things can be twisted - and cause them more damage than good.

[CaudleHalbard]

On a scale of 1-10, about 3 I would say.

[fruit_cake]

about 5..normally it would be around 8 or 9, but with no live feed, crap editing and stupid cliched background music every five minutes it just doesn't seem the same anymore

[Tony1111]

Depends how good the housemates are going to be. I think the downfall of CBB was that there was no argumentative personalities in there. We need some real bitches like Charlie!

[Blog Rider]

0/10 because without 24 hour live coverage its just a soap not Big Brother

[mizzy25]

2 @ the most as i find it dissapointing that they r all single and all under 30. its ageist for a start and i like to see varierty. paddy cbb winner aged 51 and married so why all under 30 and all single? doesnt make sense but il watch anyway

[Ammi]

Not nearly as excited as I was before CBB

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by mizzy25

2 @ the most as i find it dissapointing that they r all single and all under 30. its ageist for a start and i like to see varierty. paddy cbb winner aged 51 and married so why all under 30 and all single? doesnt make sense but il watch anyway

As I said before, it's all about encouraging fauxmances. If you have singles under 30, you are more likely to get them.

I wonder how BB would cope with a gay fauxmance though? Would they encourage it by favourable editing? I have a suspicion not...

They could have done with some hyperactive twins to liven the place up!