[Roy Mars III]

Craig is the worst Bond in looks and actually playing the part

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Roy Mars III

Craig is the worst Bond in looks and actually playing the part

Couldn't agree less. He's much closer to the Bond of the original books than any of the others who've played him on screen.

[Roy Mars III]

Originally Posted by Livia

Couldn't agree less. He's much closer to the Bond of the original books than any of the others who've played him on screen.

he doesn't use enough gadgets

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Livia

Couldn't agree less. He's much closer to the Bond of the original books than any of the others who've played him on screen.

no the creators believe dalton was the closest to the bond they wrote, though connery was close, as for craig, imho he is by far the worst bond, utterly charmless, humourless and gadgetless, in reality black humour is a massive part of everyday life in the secret service or any combat role, so his deadpan humourless take is not remotely realistic. the fact he got overhyped for one scene showing off his gym muscles, just about sums about how far the franchise has fallen. the last craig movie was no better than your run of the mill scwarzennegger turkey from the 1980s muscles and explosions and nothing else,very poor indeed.

[Roy Mars III]

Originally Posted by the truth

no the creators believe dalton was the closest to the bond they wrote, though connery was close, as for craig, imho he is by far the worst bond, utterly charmless, humourless and gadgetless, in reality black humour is a massive part of everyday life in the secret service or any combat role, so his deadpan humourless take is not remotely realistic. the fact he got overhyped for one scene showing off his gym muscles, just about sums about how far the franchise has fallen. the last craig movie was no better than your run of the mill scwarzennegger turkey from the 1980s muscles and explosions and nothing else,very poor indeed.

amazing post

[Livia]

Originally Posted by the truth

no the creators believe dalton was the closest to the bond they wrote, though connery was close, as for craig, imho he is by far the worst bond, utterly charmless, humourless and gadgetless, in reality black humour is a massive part of everyday life in the secret service or any combat role, so his deadpan humourless take is not remotely realistic. the fact he got overhyped for one scene showing off his gym muscles, just about sums about how far the franchise has fallen. the last craig movie was no better than your run of the mill scwarzennegger turkey from the 1980s muscles and explosions and nothing else,very poor indeed.

No?

I'm talking about Fleming's original books rather than what the producers said about their own screenplays. To me, Craig is the closest to the Bond of the books who is quite a different animal to the Bond on screen. The only thing missing from the Daniel Craig films as far as I'm concerned is that they don't use the Bond incidental music enough... or, in fact, at all in Casino Royale.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Livia

No?

I'm talking about Fleming's original books rather than what the producers said about their own screenplays. To me, Craig is the closest to the Bond of the books who is quite a different animal to the Bond on screen. The only thing missing from the Daniel Craig films as far as I'm concerned is that they don't use the Bond incidental music enough... or, in fact, at all in Casino Royale.

as with many topics we shall have to agree to disagree. I think the craig bond films are simply run of the mill boring action films, he lacks almost everything including, charisma, humour, charm, fun, one liners, gadgets etc Im also pretty sure fleming didnt write a politically correct bond either, so its not like the book in that aspect either

[Lee.]

Gadgets? Who cares about gadgets?!

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Gadgets? Who cares about gadgets?!

why dont u just go and leer at bodybuilders all day, or just leer at wwe wrestlers, soooo boring, whilst we look for a decent movie with fun, humour, romance, amazing locations, legendary bad guys like scaramanga, goldfinger, oddjob and jaws, great one liners, great chemistry, great stories, great action sequences and legendary stunts and awesome gadgetry....who the heck wants this miserable politically correct bond....zzzz.....its like hes been written by the new labour party, im amazed they didnt cast harriet harmon as M....this is what bonds about....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2gdFK-2mY4


craig is awful, worse than lazenby

the rest were great in different ways, even though dear old roger was as wooden as woody woodpecker, his movies were always spectacularly entertaining and enormous fun. bring back the fun

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by the truth

why dont u just go and leer at bodybuilders all day, or just leer at wwe wrestlers, soooo boring, whilst we look for a decent movie with fun, humour, romance, amazing locations, legendary bad guys like scaramanga, goldfinger, oddjob and jaws, great one liners, great chemistry, great stories, great action sequences and legendary stunts and awesome gadgetry....who the heck wants this miserable politically correct bond....zzzz.....its like hes been written by the new labour party, im amazed they didnt cast harriet harmon as M....this is what bonds about....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2gdFK-2mY4


craig is awful, worse than lazenby

the rest were great in different ways, even though dear old roger was as wooden as woody woodpecker, his movies were always spectacularly entertaining and enormous fun. bring back the fun

I don't find bodybuilders attractive, nor wrestlers for that matter?

I actually don't really care who the best Bond is... all the films are dreadful regardless of leading man, and I certainly don't find them fun, entertaining or humorous!!

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Lee.

I don't find bodybuilders attractive, nor wrestlers for that matter?

I actually don't really care who the best Bond is... all the films are dreadful regardless of leading man, and I certainly don't find them fun, entertaining or humorous!!

ok thats sad because millions aorund the world have loved them for 50 years. cant really figure why youd even bother posting on a bond thread if you hate it so much. apart from leering at a bodybuilders physique.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by the truth

ok thats sad because millions aorund the world have loved them for 50 years. cant really figure why youd even bother posting on a bond thread if you hate it so much. apart from leering at a bodybuilders physique.

forum members can post wherever they want, stop being so nasty all the time

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by the truth

ok thats sad because millions aorund the world have loved them for 50 years. cant really figure why youd even bother posting on a bond thread if you hate it so much. apart from leering at a bodybuilders physique.

I can assure you its not his physique I leer over.. its his twinkly blue eyes and his rugged features

...and I can post in whatever thread I want, you dint specify that only Bond fans could post here.

[Niamh.]

I don't get the Daniel Craig attraction at all, he's got a head like a bag of spanners

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I don't get the Daniel Craig attraction at all, he's got a head like a bag of spanners

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Is that the woman in Real housewives of NY Lee?on your gif

[Roy Mars III]

Bond is nothing without gadgets

[Niamh.]

[Roy Mars III]

this is a fan only conversation!

[Shaun]

Worst is Moore. I know he's supposedly the most charming but I found his Bond films about as threatening and exciting as microwaveable slippers. Bond should be naturally charming without every other line being a double entendre.

[InOne]

This Bond thread is getting taken over by horny women.

[Ammi]

...Sean Connery