[Ryan.]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Would this stop them from being able to see it on their phones, iPods, tablets etc?

Yes. The default filters are applied at the ISP level, so any device connected to your Wi-Fi would be blocked. I don't understand why millions of normal, unmarried people without kids are being forced to ring up and say 'Hey I wanna jerk off to Big Bitches 7, unlock it please'

Opt-out of porn is so much easier, and actually understandable. All this does is demonise sexual thoughts of any type. Its typical Daily-Mail headline winning nanny-state fodder.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Would this stop them from being able to see it on their phones, iPods, tablets etc?

Only when in Cafe
starbucks or Cafe nero etc

[arista]

direct.tv have a adult section you pay once (small fee)only then its Free.
For Example.

[Lee.]

I'm happy with this decision tbh.

[Kizzy]

Good! bliddy brilliant about time, does nobody think of the sexual exploitation and trafficking of women and children while you're pulling away at your plonkers....no?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Good! bliddy brilliant about time, does nobody think of the sexual exploitation and trafficking of women and children while you're pulling away at your plonkers....no?

Lets see how it pans out
as this is a Pre Election gig



I assume miliboy will follow this.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Good! bliddy brilliant about time, does nobody think of the sexual exploitation and trafficking of women and children while you're pulling away at your plonkers....no?

People who are willing to throw away their rights depress me.

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

People who are willing to throw away their rights depress me.

You still have the choice to watch porn though, so they're not taking your right away?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Lee.

You still have the choice to watch porn though, so they're not taking your right away?

Yes I do not want a family filter
So I have no blocks

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

People who are willing to throw away their rights depress me.

What exactly are you trying to say here dezzy? don't speak in riddles if you have something to say say it.
You want anyone including children to be able to access gratuitous porn,.. is this what you're saying?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

What exactly are you trying to say here dezzy? don't speak in riddles if you have something to say say it.
You want anyone including children to be able to access gratuitous porn,.. is this what you're saying?

It's fairly obvious what I'm saying, even a child could decipher what I'm saying.

I'm saying that it's down to the parents to prevent their children looking at age inappropriate stuff, there's plenty of childproof options already. You shouldn't surrender your rights just because you don't want to get a childlock on your internet connection.

[Ryan.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's fairly obvious what I'm saying, even a child could decipher what I'm saying.

I'm saying that it's down to the parents to prevent their children looking at age inappropriate stuff, there's plenty of childproof options already. You shouldn't surrender your rights just because you don't want to get a childlock on your internet connection.

THis 100% Dezzy. People are too quick to chuck away their civil liberties just because Mr David says its a bad thing.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's fairly obvious what I'm saying, even a child could decipher what I'm saying.

I'm saying that it's down to the parents to prevent their children looking at age inappropriate stuff, there's plenty of childproof options already. You shouldn't surrender your rights just because you don't want to get a childlock on your internet connection.

I am not
I am saying Yes to porn



This 2014
Pre election gig

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's fairly obvious what I'm saying, even a child could decipher what I'm saying.

I'm saying that it's down to the parents to prevent their children looking at age inappropriate stuff, there's plenty of childproof options already. You shouldn't surrender your rights just so the government can raise your kids because you don't want to get a childlock on your internet connection.

I doubt that dezzy, no need to be rude.
My opinion has less to do with that and more to do with the illegal practices within the porn industry, of course the government need to put in place this kind of protection and filters as this material floods the internet.

[Firewire]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Good! bliddy brilliant about time, does nobody think of the sexual exploitation and trafficking of women

gay porn doesn't do this tbh

[Samuel.]

Originally Posted by Firewire

gay porn does neither of this tbh

Implying only straight people are pedophiles

Heterophobe

[Firewire]

Originally Posted by Samuel.

Implying only straight people are pedophiles

Heterophobe

no i was saying that gay porn does not exploit women, because it doesn't (the bit about the children i didn't see i didn't mean to comment on that)

[Josy]

I'm not bothered either way but I find it amusing that the government think this is going to work anyway, people will always find away to get round filters, they already do...

Reading this though

Only an adult will be able to change the filter settings and the account holder will receive a confirmation email. Some ISPs are offering text alerts, in case children hack into the account.

That doesn't sound like you need to specifically contact the ISP to have the filters removed? just sounds like you can turn them off and will receive an email confirming it..

[Samuel.]

Originally Posted by Firewire

no i was saying that gay porn does not exploit women, because it doesn't (the bit about the children i didn't see i didn't mean to comment on that)

I was kidding

[Ryan.]

Oh good, the feminists are out in force. When they come for you, there will be noone left to save you.

This is how it begins people. NSA, Prism, this.

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Ryan.

Oh good, the feminists are out in force. When they come for you, there will be noone left to save you.

This is how it begins people. NSA, Prism, this.

Are you calling me a feminist? I hope not.

Porn doesn't bother me at all..I quite like it actually, but I hate how easily accessible it is for my kids. I want them to be innocent and enjoy their childhood for as long as possible.

[Ryan.]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Are you calling me a feminist? I hope not.

Porn doesn't bother me at all..I quite like it actually, but I hate how easily accessible it is for my kids. I want them to be innocent and enjoy their childhood for as long as possible.

But why should the millions of unmarried, single people in this country suffer or be forced to declare their love of porn just for the protection of your family? What is wrong with an Opt-in; Where you say "Actually BT, turn off the porn for me - I have young kids who use the internet in my house"

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Ryan.

But why should the millions of unmarried, single people in this country suffer or be forced to declare their love of porn just for the protection of your family? What is wrong with an Opt-in; Where you say "Actually BT, turn off the porn for me - I have young kids who use the internet in my house"

Why should my children have access to millions of pages of hardcore, sometimes violent pornography just so you can toss yourself off?

[Ryan.]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Why should my children have access to millions of pages of hardcore, sometimes violent pornography just so you can toss yourself off?

Well they wouldn't have to. Surely as a concerned parent its not embarrassing to lift the phone and ask for the filter to be activated. Much less invasive than asking millions to lift the phone and declare to their ISP/The Government that they quite fancy a wank because they are obviously such dirty perverted little freaks.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Ryan.

Oh good, the feminists are out in force. When they come for you, there will be noone left to save you.

This is how it begins people. NSA, Prism, this.

I beg your pardon?...
Could you explain why you feel anyone who is against exploitation should be labelled a feminist?