| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| BB2 Brian Dowling, Helen and Paul, Dean and the rest of the Big Brother 2 housemates from 2001. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Last edited by Macie Lightfoot; 23-05-2014 at 07:01 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
I wasn't going on about nostalgia. I was talking about how I prefer Big Brother to be about a group of stranger getting to know one another. The live feeds watching them having long conversations. Not the overflow "story lines" and constant bitching and arguing. Staging and blowing things out of proportion for the cameras. The same went for last summer. I loved the small amount of live feed we'd get, watching the housemates settle down after an eviction and discuss the night's/or the previous week's events. That's not nostalgia, that's a preference of what I'd like to see in the highlights show. Telling me I only like BB2 because of nostalgia, is because I'm remembering 2001 and only like it because of how everything was back in 2001. Romanticising the past by forgetting the bad parts. Or having some strong personal affinity with that time. I don't, I barely remember 2001. It isn't. It's how I prefer the show in 2014 too. Last edited by Marsh.; 23-05-2014 at 07:09 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Mystic Mock
|
Update on my list after watching a couple of more highlight shows.
1. Paul 2. Narinder 3. Brian 4. Amma 5. Bubble 6. Helen 7. Dean 8. Stuart 9. Penny 10. Elizabeth
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Mystic Mock
|
Does he get less repulsive? And thanks BigSister, I'll be watching some more in the minute.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Glad your enjoying bb2 mock.
__________________
![]() ![]() Founder of the Hate Louis Walsh Fanclub Founder of the Glyn fanclub Member 15 of the Luke fanclub member 34 of the kat fanclub member 11 of the rex fanclub Member of the rachel fanclub |
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
||||
|
Niamh | Hands off my Brick!
|
awww I loved BB2 so much, I watched BB1 but BB2 was the one that really got me hooked on Big Brother. Brian Dowling as well
Best HM ever
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
Mystic Mock
|
There is one a-list contestant in this series, the others are good though.
1. Narinder 2. Paul 3. Brian 4. Amma 5. Bubble 6. Helen 7. Penny 8. Stuart 9. Dean 10. Elizabeth
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
But for the show to seem fresh there needs to be something happening, and once you get past maybe Week 3 or 4 nothing happened. Almost all of the "moments" you listed happened very early into the season. And I agree that the Dexter/Callum **** got tiring, but that's because there was no forward plot movement at all, it was the same thing over and over again. A storyline with actual development and forward movement really can't be beat in BBUK, it's why seasons like 5, 6, 7, and 13 were so good.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
And sorry but you don't think BB7 stalled for the last 4 weeks? The rest of the nation did and the producers hence them bringing back ex housemates people paid money to evict *winces. BB2 was great in 2001 it flowed, had just the right amount of fun, friendships, love interests, arguments and a lot of actual political talk which then was interesting but now is a diary room warning waiting to happen. BB2 was never slow or uninteresting every episode had stuff going on partly because the episodes were only 25 minutes lol but still I t was a classic series. So underappreciated. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
It's not underappreciated at all, everyone loves it solely because of the nostalgia. Watching it back in 2014 it sucks and it can be argued to be worse than BB4. There was no flow because there was nothing to flow. The few arguments there were could easily be counted on one hand and were all in the first few weeks. The only love interests were Paul and Helen, and that didn't even reach a peak until the penultimate week (not to mention that Helen HAD A BOYFRIEND.) The friendships were like, Brian/Narinder and then Dean/Elizabeth, who almost killed the show. The whole thing was a dull mess, especially the second half. Like, let's just take a minute and realize that more things happened in BB4 than BB2.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
BB2 is very much more adult in the sense its more political and you have to have the concentration span bigger than a nat to really get into it and not just watch it for BIG "ROCK THE HOUSE " TWISTS. BB4 was terrible, its not called Big Brother Bore for nothing. BB4 was at the height of my BB fascination and what I witnessed was dreadful lol. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#15 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
Quote:
You can act as pretentious as you want saying that BB2 was ~more adult~ and whatnot but it was boring. It really wasn't even a political series but you can keep using that word to make it sound sophisticated if you want. BB4 actually had overarching stories that kept the plot advancing and things actually happened. After Week 3 or 4 of BB2, there's nothing tangible to hold onto. It's just low-level interactions that are somewhat interesting in isolation but painfully blend together when looking at the season as a whole. There's nothing interesting or political about it.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Macie Lightfoot; 22-05-2014 at 08:12 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
BB4 actually had overarching stories that kept the plot advancing and things actually happened Yes but give examples? What an invaluable forum member you are when whenever you back up your opinion you give no examples. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
As for your first point, I recommend you look up the meaning of gradual.
As for your second point, we had actual characters in Jon and Federico, the Africa swap, the bomb scare, Jon's return, the first example of poorly mistreating intruders in The Trials and Tribulations of Lisa Jeynes (who doesn't get enough credit as a HM), Steph and Nush's rivalry, Federico failing at shopping tasks, everyone regretting their nominations for Anouska, etc. BB2 was just a series of micro-interactions that didn't go anywhere. Like, after Week 4 does anyone have a purpose besides Brian and Helen and Paul? Absolutely not.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
All the other stuff you mentioned which made the show "enjoyable" were desperate ploys from producers to get viewers who were switching off watching. BB2 didn't have to do that, more people watched. Last edited by daniel-lewis-1985; 22-05-2014 at 10:30 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
Dean, Elizabeth, Josh, Amma, and Bubble certainly weren't.
And yes, the bomb scare and things that happened inside of the house like everyone's individual storylines were desperate ploys by the producers give it a ****ing break. And for what it's worth BB2 and BB4 were almost equal in number of viewers so keep grasping at your straws.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#20 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
You're grasping at straws. Last edited by daniel-lewis-1985; 22-05-2014 at 11:16 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#21 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
I'm not grasping at straws because ~4.5-4.6 million viewers for BB2 is equal to the ~4.6 million viewers for BB4. And that's with the novelty having worn off.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#22 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
BB5 ended up averaging about 5.1 million afterwards which shows how big BB still was. BB4 was just ****e and im sure in any poll most fans would agree. Last edited by daniel-lewis-1985; 22-05-2014 at 11:33 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#23 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
"only three years" in case you didn't realize, BBUK is LONG and is an exhausting project to watch. Three years of 64 days is A LOT of viewing and naturally people are going to be tired. Viewership peaks and then goes on a decline, it happens in every show. BB4 managing to pull roughly the same viewership as BB2 two years later really isn't as bad as you try to make it out to be. And you're not even getting my point right, at all. I said that the argument can be made that BB2 was worse than BB4 based on the fact that absolutely nothing happened, especially in the second half. Your desperate attempts to factor in viewership and fan polls ("I'm right because most people agree with me!!!!!11" like no) don't change that.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#24 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The figures speak for themselves, people were bored so they switched off. Anyway this isn't about whats better BB4 or BB2 its the BB2 forum so lets get over your weird obsession with BB4 and get back on topic. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#25 | |||
|
||||
|
As Told by Troy
|
Quote:
and lol at, me: *makes a simple statement comparing BB2 to BB4* you: support your argument! you're an awful poster if you don't! me: *supports simple statement made earlier* you: get back on topic, you're obsessed!
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|