[Denver]

Originally Posted by Ellen

Did KH say KP was a bad mother or is a follow on from the conversation they had the other day about paying for her sons travel?

Its hard to say until we see it as we dont know the whole story just yet

[erinp5]

Katie Price's mother has spoken out in the star's defence, after she sparked the ire of Katie Hopkins - and the public - when it was revealed she leans on taxpayers' money to care for her disabled son.

In an interview with The Sun, Amy Price, 62, has spoken of the difficulties her daughter faces in taking care of 12-year-old Harvey, whose daily taxi rides to school are paid for by the Government.

She said: 'It is so hurtful people can criticise my daughter for doing the best she can for Harvey. Katie Hopkins would never know how difficult having a disabled child can be.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...#ixzz3QEOcmkOX
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Vicky.]

Ugh, hopkins is totally wrong here. While I kinda share her opinion that price is taking the pee slightly with her income and such taking handouts from the government...no way would I labour the point like this.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Neither did I , I simply stated facts and if you google Harvey, he is quite the little celebrity and a lovely lad. My point is he shouldn't be up there in the first place as he has better things to do than live his life in the media spotlight and if you don't believe me I could spend weeks sending you shots of him with his mum and reems of information out there given by his mum.

All this crap about her not being proud of him is tosh. How often do you hear about the other 4 kids that she loves though. Point proven and please don't hang the disgusting lable of disabled child hater at my doorstep, Ive done more for disabled children than all of this forum put together, ok.

She always mentions every child but Harvey will always be special to her for obvious circumstances

[Ellen]

Originally Posted by adamski94

Its hard to say until we see it as we dont know the whole story just yet

Thanks, i thought this had been shown on the ch 5 website and i had missed it. Will probably be shown tonight.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Ugh, hopkins is totally wrong here. While I kinda share her opinion that price is taking the pee slightly with her income and such taking handouts from the government...no way would I labour the point like this.

Its not Katie that is taking handouts it is her son and he is very much entitled to it

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Ellen

Thanks, i thought this had been shown on the ch 5 website and i had missed it. Will probably be shown tonight.

The website never show the whole story imo

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

Its not Katie that is taking handouts it is her son and he is very much entitled to it

She choses to take them, not him so I see it as her Im not saying shes/hes not entitled to it as I said in the other thread..it just seems wrong when other disabled kids and such are getting their lives disrupted in the name of 'cuts' while millionaires are able to claim :S

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

She choses to take them, not him so I see it as her Im not saying shes/hes not entitled to it as I said in the other thread..it just seems wrong when other disabled kids and such are getting their lives disrupted in the name of 'cuts' while millionaires are able to claim :S

She has and will continue to pay more tax then me, you or any other average working person in the UK so there for she should be allowed to take back out to help care for her son

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by adamski94

She always mentions every child but Harvey will always be special to her for obvious circumstances

Sorry but bollocks.....Evidence teaches us that disabled children cant handle the media spotlight AT ALL and the best way to treat them IS BY TREATING THEM AS NORMAL HUMAN BEINGS.

They are not disabled or unfortunate, they are gods special children and they always flourish when treated normally. I hardly think that a photo shoot at her mansion with all his toys and gismos for all to see, is the right thing to do.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Neither did I , I simply stated facts and if you google Harvey, he is quite the little celebrity and a lovely lad. My point is he shouldn't be up there in the first place as he has better things to do than live his life in the media spotlight and if you don't believe me I could spend weeks sending you shots of him with his mum and reems of information out there given by his mum.

All this crap about her not being proud of him is tosh. How often do you hear about the other 4 kids that she loves though. Point proven and please don't hang the disgusting lable of disabled child hater at my doorstep, Ive done more for disabled children than all of this forum put together, ok.

Calling her a bad mother is unfair and out of order imo when from what I've ever seen of her, she always does the best she can for him. I have no idea why you think I'm labeling you a disabled child hater when it was the mother of the child you were attacking, also I have no idea what relevance what you may or may not have done for charity has either

[Crimson Dynamo]

I wonder why she does not move nearer the school?

[Denver]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Sorry but bollocks.....Evidence teaches us that disabled children cant handle the media spotlight AT ALL and the best way to treat them IS BY TREATING THEM AS NORMAL HUMAN BEINGS.

They are not disabled or unfortunate, they are gods special children and they always flourish when treated normally. I hardly think that a photo shoot at her mansion with all his toys and gismos for all to see, is the right thing to do.

I think this is a load of BS beacuse she is caught by the paps out with her kids or she posts picture on social media there is no bloody need to call her a bad mother and i think some peoples attitude towards this stinks

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Calling her a bad mother is unfair and out of order imo when from what I've ever seen of her, she always does the best she can for him. I have no idea why you think I'm labeling you a disabled child hater when it was the mother of the child you were attacking, also I have no idea what relevance what you may or may not have done for charity has either

Where have I called her a bad mother and its a pity that you should say that doing anything for charity is wrong.....you see how things can be twisted, now its time to drop this thread as its getting personal and way off topic. \my fund raising acts are my business and up to my conscience.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

She has and will continue to pay more tax then me, you or any other average working person in the UK so there for she should be allowed to take back out to help care for her son

Never said she wasnt allowed, I just take a dim view on people who take help when its not needed when others who do need the help are screwed over

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I think this is a load of BS beacuse she is caught by the paps out with her kids or she posts picture on social media there is no bloody need to call her a bad mother and i think some peoples attitude towards this stinks

FFS I have never called her a bad MOTHER, just a bad PERSON, big difference.

[Vicky.]

For the record too, I do think (from what I have seen) that shes an amazing mother. I do disagree with parading kids to the media, but thats both her and petes decision and I guess down to personal choice.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Where have I called her a bad mother and its a pity that you should say that doing anything for charity is wrong.....you see how things can be twisted, now its time to drop this thread as its getting personal and way off topic. \my fund raising acts are my business and up to my conscience.

You're the one that brought them up not me.............twilight zone

[Denver]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I wonder why she does not move nearer the school?

Because its a special school and she also has to think off the over kids as there might not be a school close by also she need more help then just taxi to school

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by erinp5

Katie Price's mother has spoken out in the star's defence, after she sparked the ire of Katie Hopkins - and the public - when it was revealed she leans on taxpayers' money to care for her disabled son.

In an interview with The Sun, Amy Price, 62, has spoken of the difficulties her daughter faces in taking care of 12-year-old Harvey, whose daily taxi rides to school are paid for by the Government.

She said: 'It is so hurtful people can criticise my daughter for doing the best she can for Harvey. Katie Hopkins would never know how difficult having a disabled child can be.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...#ixzz3QEOcmkOX
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

There must be more from the mum. What does that small statement have to do with price of eggs?

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Never said she wasnt allowed, I just take a dim view on people who take help when its not needed when others who do need the help are screwed over

I see it as a choice of helping a disabled child or funding a drug addicts addiction or sombody who cant be arsed to work

[Kazanne]

Good God,have we even seen the scenario yet? looks like people have made their minds up already,that figures.I will wait and see or id this just the tail end of the convo the other night.people swearing and getting irate,just why?

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by adamski94

Because its a special school and she also has to think off the over kids as there might not be a school close by also she need more help then just taxi to school

Ok so everyomne in her manor is getting aid to send their kids to schools on a 100 mile trip with their own personal drivers and nurses. Well for a start, if he has his own driver as she stated, I would like to know how the cost of 1000 a day is reached or is that what she s charging the gov. Fooking graet job her driver has, 7000 quid a week less expenses like petrol and a silly hat.

Harvey gets a fooking paid for taxi, the driver bit is bollocks and pricey didn't think before she spoke. I

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I see it as a choice of helping a disabked child or funding a drug addicts addiction or sombody who cant be arsed to work

Really, you think those are the only options?! What about the other disabled kids who are having to move house due to the bedroom tax (and disabled people are NOT excluded as the government claims btw). About disabled adults/kids who are losing their dla entitlements because of cuts also...etc.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I see it as a choice of helping a disabked child or funding a drug addicts addiction or sombody who cant be arsed to work

Or indeed another tit job or plastic surgery,imo IF you can afford it pay for stuff yourself and let some other poor unfortunate benefit from your tax money,as tbf we don't seem to mind paying for the likes oh White dee types.