[sampvt]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Are you going to pay back the people you told to put the wife's housekeeping money on Joel going, cause they have no money left now to put the insurance bet on.

You are now beginning to look very silly, quit whilst you are ahead son, its better to walk away with a clip round the ear than to enter into a fight you cant win. Your point is duely noted and it raised a titter for which I am grateful.

[Liam-]

[Beso]

Originally Posted by sampvt

You are now beginning to look very silly, quit whilst you are ahead son, its better to walk away with a clip round the ear than to enter into a fight you cant win. Your point is duely noted and it raised a titter for which I am grateful.

I might charge you for it next time.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by parmnion

I might charge you for it next time.

I might even pay you, god knows I can afford it now,

[Dash Darington]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Going by your analysis, you seem hell bent on trying to push the point that I abandoned my mantle of the Oracle by placing an insurance bet. Let me ask you this, would you rather win £300 with zero risk of £500 with a medium risk. If you answer the former you are agreeing with me, if you answer the later you are a mug punter. If you don't answer with any logical rhetoric, you admit defeat and my mantle of Oracle stands in tact and you enter troll territory.

Why don't you offer facts not supposition, I am far better placed to argue the toss with a logical debate as opposed to bickering with someone who is plainly jealous of someone obviously more successful that your good self

Now do we agree to disagree and move on, are you just going to keep on digging at me.

As I've said repeatedly, you didn't simply place an insurance bet (which itself would be a sign of uncertainty). You've bet both sides. In answer to your question, I'd take the first option and take the guaranteed £300. I do agree with you, and I've said so. It is a sound response to your own uncertainty. You've just described a "medium risk" that your prediction is incorrect, which means you're not an Oracle, and your predictions have a significant element of uncertainty.

I won't fault you for your repeated insults and ad hominem attacks, as I suspect you can't help yourself.

[Jimrod]

Originally Posted by sampvt

so no matter which way the vote goes, I collect £300 clear profit with zero risk..

Until you wake up on Saturday morning £400 down after BB interferes "for a change" and makes this a "surprise" non-eviction where the loser is moved into a secret second house...


Christian will finish 4th.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Dash Darington

As I've said repeatedly, you didn't simply place an insurance bet (which itself would be a sign of uncertainty). You've bet both sides. In answer to your question, I'd take the first option and take the guaranteed £300. I do agree with you, and I've said so. It is a sound response to your own uncertainty. You've just described a "medium risk" that your prediction is incorrect, which means you're not an Oracle, and your predictions have a significant element of uncertainty.

I won't fault you for your repeated insults and ad hominem attacks, as I suspect you can't help yourself.

And I wont slate you anymore for your inane attacks and opinions that hold no weight, obviously you know no better, judging by the mere fact that all you do is offer daft retorts devoid of any logic.

The Oracle is an all knowing and all informed entity that very rarely looses. How can anyone blame me for trading in a medium risk for a no risk bet. Logic must prevail in these times of uncertainty.

When the day comes that you feel confident to stand toe to toe with the likes of me, please yank my chain, I will no only destroy you with well placed and designed rhetoric, I will make you look like a pauper trying to grab up the crumbs of success that fall from my plate.

So in closing lets have your feelings on who is going to win BB this year.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Jimrod

Until you wake up on Saturday morning £400 down after BB interferes "for a change" and makes this a "surprise" non-eviction where the loser is moved into a secret second house...


Christian will finish 4th.

That cant happen as people have paid money to see an eviction and Ive already suggested The plank might come 4th or 5th but it would only be a foolish man to bet this early given the prods interference this year. BTW if someone goes into a secret house, the bet stands as they are the voted out entity so bookies will payout. The only way I could loose is if they cancel the eviction and I get my stakes back anyway, but that wont happen.

[Crimson Dynamo]

A gambler thinking they have a full proof system?


Not many threads by gamblers telling us how much they have lost I notice

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

A gambler thinking they have a full proof system?


Not many threads by gamblers telling us how much they have lost I notice

no but there seems be a fair amount of dissing posts by people with only troll comments to make