Quote:
Originally Posted by Lostie!
There's a difference between playing the other housemates and playing the public (some of whom part with their money to vote).
|
To be honest if a housemate is clever enough to fool the public (who quite frankly should be able to see through it) then they're playing an even better game than they would be if they were just fooling their other housemates. If the public are stupid and deluded enough to part with their money to vote for someone who they can't see is fooling them, then that's their problem. More props to the 'fake' housemate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lostie!
Not "moot" at all. Some of us value real interactions over fake, OTT performances on BB, and it's bizarre to suggest real housemates automatically contribute nothing. You honestly believe the only ones who provide entertainment are the fake ones?
|
I never once said they automatically contribute nothing, and I also never said the only ones who provided entertainment are the fake ones.
I also enjoy the real interactions between housemates and it's part of the reason why I miss live feed so much, listening to the random conversations about life they used to have. The point I was making was that given a choice between a 'real' housemate who sits in the background the entire series and doesn't offer anything up to the series (Pav, Maysoon, Sam Evans, multiple others) or a supposedly 'fake' housemate who is pretty much the star of the show and is offering a lot, the latter is most definitely a better housemate in terms of what's best for the show. It is not an either or, just that 'fake' housemates can sometimes be good.
Aaron,
Linear Mode
