[bots]

Originally Posted by Jack_

But it's not an opinion...because housemates can, do and have put on personas, because it is a gameshow.

That was hilarious an example of a persona done well, when it's messy and pathetic <3

Of course its an opinion. How I choose to view the show and evaluate characters is up to me, not anyone else. If I think she is trying to scam the public, and there is evidence available to support it. I want to know it, and it will be relevant to ME when I decide if someone is being fake or not

[bots]

Originally Posted by Jack_

It isn't an opinion. I said that housemates are perfectly entitled to create a persona in the gameshow that is Big Brother, you said that is my opinion, but the fact is that housemates can, do and have created personas inside the house, so it's not an opinion that 'they're entitled to', they are. They aren't ejected by Big Brother for doing so, so therefore it's not against the rules and they're entitled to do it. And they do. Which is a fact.



You have got to be kidding, right? I'm probably the person on this forum the most who spends my days criticising the dullards, arguing they contribute nothing to the show and need to be gotten rid of, and supporting the big characters despite how much hate they get for being 'arseholes'.

I'd suggest taking a look at my profile favourites to see exactly what I mean.

We can go round in circles all day if you like

You cannot dictate to me how I choose to view the show and evaluate the house mates. How I chose to evaluate them is based on my own principles, not yours or anyone elses


So please do not state as fact something that clearly isn't

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

We can go round in circles all day if you like

You cannot dictate to me how I choose to view the show and evaluate the house mates. How I chose to evaluate them is based on my own principles, not yours or anyone elses


So please do not state as fact something that clearly isn't

We aren't talking about how you choose to evaluate them, we're talking about whether the housemates are entitled to put on a persona inside the house, which as I have already explained, they are. Whether or not you agree with them doing so is up to you (although quite frankly it's a bit silly to take issue with it, it's a gameshow and the main issue is whether the persona is entertaining and contributes anything to the show or not), but on the issue of whether they are entitled and allowed to create a persona inside the house, it is factual that they are. Because they can, do and have. And Big Brother hasn't ejected them, because it isn't against the rules.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Her character outside the show is very relevant when she is pretending to be something she is not on the show. Its very simple. Same with Danny, they are a right pair.

..but it's not as if they can 'pretend' though, isn't that the thing..like Danielle last year as well as you mentioned, they're all completely savvy to the workings of BB/reality TV and know exactly that the public will know these things about them so in a way are not pretending anything...

[AnnieK]

Judging housemates on their actions outside has always happened though, back in its hey day the Sunday papers were full of kiss and tell type stories of what housemates had done in the past, now HMs just get in there first with the stories to make themselves seem outrageous.

[sampvt]

Ive read all these posts and on the one hand people are saying these contestants can bring scammer identities and back stories to the table and if they get through the net then fine, but are we expected as normal people, to simply disregard the fact that someone has slipped through the net with a scammer backstory and treat them with respect based on what they do on the show.

Sorry but the definition of a conman is someone who is generally believable until the dirty deed is done and I for one, don't like being conned. If all you watch this show for is blood, guts and thunder, then fine, but some of us like to see fun, interaction, arguments and good clean storylines with a bit of spice thrown in, not the likes of slimy characters like Danny, Chloe and Joel with Nick and harry on the fringe of cringe and scam.

[the truth]

shes clearly a nasty piece of work, her whole innocent sensitive poor me schtick is a lie throughout. shes utterly selfish and fake and her best mate was evil Helen wood ?now were seeing the real chloe and its very very unpleasant.

[Ashley.]

Makes me love Chloe even more. Would love to go on a night out with her!

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Firegazer

Makes me love Chloe even more. Would love to go on a night out with her!

yes it be great spewing all over a taxi , avoiding the bill, ringing 999 making serious false accusations against innocent hard working men, getting locked up in jail and getting a criminal record that will be held against you for decades and damage your career and reputation....yes sounds fantastic enjoy yourself

[Suze]

Originally Posted by Firegazer

Makes me love Chloe even more. Would love to go on a night out with her!

Not long to wait until this Friday then.

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by Firegazer

Makes me love Chloe even more. Would love to go on a night out with her!

Don't put your hand in the puke

[the truth]

in addition to trying to get an innocent working man imprisoned and losing his license, some one else may have been getting mugged robbed raped or killed while she was wasting emergency police time

[Alf]

Seems to be a lot of jealousy to "The Chloster".

It's got to be jealousy because she's been nothing but a pleasant girl throughout the series.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by wannashag

Seems to be a lot of jealousy to "The Chloster".

It's got to be jealousy because she's been nothing but a pleasant girl throughout the series.

I think you are right here.

Those good looks, slim body, wealth, fame, class. How could we not envy her?

[Jack_]

(after having that gif bookmarked for two years I've finally got to use it twice in one day )

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by Jack_

(after having that gif bookmarked for two years I've finally got to use it twice in one day )

Keep it handy. You could yet get a hat-trick

[Jamie89]

She's been young and stupid... and drunk. Not justifying her actions but they don't make her a bad person, she's just made bad decisions. I think it's more important to look at if someone has learned anything from their actions and changed rather than just condemn them for it. Doing a bad thing doesn't make you a bad person. I'm sure most of us have done things that we would be judged negatively for but that don't define who we really are.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by LiamBB

She's been young and stupid... and drunk. Not justifying her actions but they don't make her a bad person, she's just made bad decisions. I think it's more important to look at if someone has learned anything from their actions and changed rather than just condemn them for it. Doing a bad thing doesn't make you a bad person. I'm sure most of us have done things that we would be judged negatively for but that don't define who we really are.

She refused to condemn Helen. Ergo, a scumbag.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by just thinkin

If its not got to do with bb show dont post it here. Nobody cares

Originally Posted by sampvt

I reported this about her weeks ago and nobody believed me. She and all her family are scum and well known in Donny for drugs, violence and shady dealings.

This story was part of Chloes BB introduction interview, we posted it along with the other housemates info on Launch night. So she brought it into BB by herself with her finding it oh so hilarious.