[Will.]

The only reason I did this thread as being Bisexual I never knew it was against 'the label' to be attracted to trans etc. people.

So I would consider myself Pansexual now.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Will1999

The only reason I did this thread as being Bisexual I never knew it was against 'the label' to be attracted to trans etc. people.

So I would consider myself Pansexual now.

That word is not on Wiki
whats its Origin?

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Will1999

The only reason I did this thread as being Bisexual I never knew it was against 'the label' to be attracted to trans etc. people.

So I would consider myself Pansexual now.

I've never considered that being attracted to trans is a pan-sexual thing. If you are attracted to a woman that was once a man or a man that was once a woman, you are attracted to a specific sex.

I used to date a cross dresser (not the same as a transvestite) who loved the feel of feminine clothes. That didn't make me pan-sexual, it just made me open to someone who had a fetish.

[Shaun]

No because it's a poncey way of saying bisexual.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Shaun

No because it's a poncey way of saying bisexual.

How Nice

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by Shaun

No because it's a poncey way of saying bisexual.

No it isn't.

[arista]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

No it isn't.

I Sorry But Shaun
has more Experience in this
than you nippers



Feel The Force

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by arista

I Sorry But Shaun
has more Experience in this
than you nippers

Feel The Force

..can we not please with the derogatory terms for young people on the forum..and referring to 'experience' as if it gives some kind of wisdom because it really doesn't...age doesn't give wisdom, only wisdom gives wisdom regardless of age...there are some very dumb people with much life experience who have been on this earth for many years...


..I've noticed this a lot in threads ..things like..come back when you're older or whatever/when you've been/when you've seen etc...and every one of us would probably hate being spoken to like that and have hated it when it's been done to us..it's extremely disrespectful...

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Shaun

No because it's a poncey way of saying bisexual.

I could not agree more. What is this trend, this need to dissect everything now? Why the obsession to categorise and classify and label?

There are MALES and FEMALES - no matter what guise or whether one elects to be the other. To which one we are attracted, or whether we are attracted to both is all that matters, and we do not need some fancy new 'label' to identify us - whatever our choice.

[Calderyon]

Is it the same as liking pan salt too much?

itsajoke.com

[Jay.]

nawt an sjw

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jay.

nawt an sjw

What Fecking Lingo is that



TIBB in the Sewers

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Jay.

nawt an sjw

[arista]

Youtube video

The Words to this 1978 Funk Song
Fit this thread

[Firewire]

Pansexuality undermines bisexuality. It makes bisexual people look ignorant for not being interested in "non-genders" when the term itself says bisexual. Regardless of your gender identity you are born either male or female and that's what bisexuality represents. It has nothing to do with gender.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Firewire

Pansexuality undermines bisexuality. It makes bisexual people look ignorant for not being interested in "non-genders" when the term itself says bisexual. Regardless of your gender identity you are born either male or female and that's what bisexuality represents. It has nothing to do with gender.

This is a fair point but the 'sexual' part of the term refers to the sexual attraction part of your sexuality, not 'sex' as in biological sex

Regardless, pansexuality is still a thing. Bisexuals are attracted to men and women - or males and females if you prefer, that's probably a better way of putting it. And pansexuals are gender blind, seek relationships on personality alone and are not just attracted to people who fall on the gender binary. I wouldn't say it infers bisexuals are ignorant at all, you can't help who you're attracted to and if males and females are your thing that's fine. If you're attracted to people outside of the gender binary, you are not bisexual.

Bi means two, and there are more than two genders.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jack_

This is a fair point but the 'sexual' part of the term refers to the sexual attraction part of your sexuality, not 'sex' as in biological sex

Regardless, pansexuality is still a thing. Bisexuals are attracted to men and women - or males and females if you prefer, that's probably a better way of putting it. And pansexuals are gender blind, seek relationships on personality alone and are not just attracted to people who fall on the gender binary. I wouldn't say it infers bisexuals are ignorant at all, you can't help who you're attracted to and if males and females are your thing that's fine. If you're attracted to people outside of the gender binary, you are not bisexual.

Bi means two, and there are more than two genders.

No Jack
it Ain't
Not on Wiki

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by arista

No Jack
it Ain't
Not on Wiki

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pansexuality

You were saying?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jack_

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pansexuality

You were saying?

I did not spell it that way
you Smart Ass

[Firewire]

People with label makers will be fuming

[Denver]

As someone who identify as pansexual i find this thread disgraceful and clear attention seeking thing.

You cant decide to just become a sexuality.

[Firewire]

You can decide to label yourself pansexual

[Liam-]

Labels are stupid, like who you like and sleep with who you want to sleep with, it doesn't need explaining to anyone

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Labels are stupid, like who you like and sleep with who you want to sleep with, it doesn't need explaining to anyone

It saves awkward scenarios of girls thinking you fancy them, or them fancying you.. (obviously this would apply to someone who doesn't like girls (eg me)).

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

It saves awkward scenarios of girls thinking you fancy them, or them fancying you.. (obviously this would apply to someone who doesn't like girls (eg me)).

I agree with Josh, labels are merely a clue that gives a direction.