[Will.]

Tellymix poll as it stands.

[Pete.]

GS fans are pushing hard for Marnie, so I wouldn't be so surprised if Chloe and Bear are in the bottom (and Bear goes )

[lewis111]

Saira was 2nd on her poll

And Marnie has so many Geordie Shore fans who will vote without even watching much f the show and won't vote in the polls
And Bear would stay over any housemate
Pretty sure James is bottom2

[lewis111]

Surely if the producers had to sacrifice one member of the rat-pack it would be Chloe so if the bottom 2 was say Marnie and Chloe they would just scarp the twist cause Chloe is obviously last

[Cal.]

Bear got the least votes then?

[Shaun]

Embarrassing.

[Yaki da]

Can you guys get over this idea that they've done this to get James out and all will be fine providing he stays in.

They have misled the voters on exactly what it is they have been voting for. That ought to be the issue here.

OFCOM is not so much for complaining about things that offend you on telly, it is for things like this. They CANNOT change the rules of a vote having led people to believe they were voting for something else. Not without serious consequences.

And yet all of you care less about that than you do them misleading people who have spent money. What is wrong with you?

[Serg]

Marnie doesn't have that much Geordie Shore following, people don't like her as much as Originals (Char,Gaz,Scotty,Vicky) and when Charlotte said on twitter please vote for her many of top comments were "I usually vote but she's a slag"

I just hope James is top 2. But they will fix it so he goes and Rats stay in.

[Nancy.]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

Can you guys get over this idea that they've done this to get James out and all will be fine providing he stays in.

They have misled the voters on exactly what it is they have been voting for. That ought to be the issue here.

OFCOM is not so much for complaining about things that offend you on telly, it is for things like this. They CANNOT change the rules of a vote having led people to believe they were voting for something else. Not without serious consequences.

And yet all of you care less about that than you do them misleading people who have spent money. What is wrong with you?

I don't usually complain about anything but I have just filled out a form on Ofcom about this. It is disgusting.

[Cherie]

How are they misleading voters, you are voting to save so the one with the most votes stays the rest they can do what they like with?

[Cherie]

In fact this is just as fair as freezing the vote, saving the top two and then asking people to vote again

[lewis111]

It's unfair in the sense that we all know Chloe will by far have the least votes out of them all
And she could stay over someone who got a lot of votes

[RhysJones]

I don't actually mind if any of them go apart from Bear, he needs to stay a bit longer. But if James goes when we could have got rid of Chloe then I won't be happy.

[Withano]

Go **** yourself bb. Unless Bears bottom two with Chloe and its a hair and make up competition or sumin.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by lewis111

It's unfair in the sense that we all know Chloe will by far have the least votes out of them all
And she could stay over someone who got a lot of votes

We have no idea who will get the least votes in fairness

[Withano]

Who stays? A game of chance decides after we take a few grand.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Withano

Who stays? A game of chance decides after we take a few grand.

But the person was got the most votes will be safe so

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Cherie

But the person was got the most votes will be safe so

Yeah, i think most people presumed the three with the most votes will be safe though. Im fine with the twist but only cus I'm relatively confident James will do well and that I never vote anyway. I can see why people are mad.

[zakman440]

Emma's confirmed in her eviction vlog that she's entering the garden as part of tonight's twist:

http://bigbrother.channel5.com/what-...-willis-day-16

[Cal.]

Not a rehash of Ryan's eviction (and it won't be as good).

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by LukeB

So many twists

Does my head in Luke, I detest that word now I really do, and it's all down to BB and their endless use of them now.

Really sick of the seemingly endless things.

Who is last should go out, no matter who they are, the public have spent money trying to save people,not possibly have the one they didn't vote to save kept in by default.

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Cherie

How are they misleading voters, you are voting to save so the one with the most votes stays the rest they can do what they like with?

They are misleading because they have not told us how many we can save. When I'm A Celebrity do things like this they make sure to tell people if there's a challenge between the bottom 2 BEFORE lines open.

The fact is, they did not inform viewers what they were voting on until 18 hours AFTER the lines opened.

Until then, everyone voting has just assumed the person with the fewest votes was going to go. Hence the reason Chloe had become such a huge favourite to be evicted.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

They are misleading because they have not told us how many we can save. When I'm A Celebrity do things like this they make sure to tell people if there's a challenge between the bottom 2 BEFORE lines open.

The fact is, they did not inform viewers what they were voting on until 18 hours AFTER the lines opened.

Until then, everyone voting has just assumed the person with the fewest votes was going to go. Hence the reason Chloe had become such a huge favourite to be evicted.

I agree, the people are voting to save their favourites,this is only a single eviction so people voting know they would need to get their favourite in the first 3 out of the 4 up obviously.

It would and should be shocking to maybe have a housemate that someone spent more on to keep in, being put out over someone who was the one with the least votes.
It those who are voting whose money and votes are for to save, not BBs money.

[Natawho]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

It's not just a case of they "should". I believe they have to do that. I am quite sure Ofcom would rule that they had misled voters.

I wish people would stop worrying about who is going to go and realise that what they are doing here is against trading standards.

You simply cannot change what people have been led to believe they are voting for mid way through a vote.

Sorry but what have they done wrong here? They did the same thing in the last series of BB, changed it to a vote to save so that they could manipulate the bottom 3, and this time they're doing it for the bottom two

People are voting to save, which only implies that the person with the most votes will be saved.

It doesn't imply anything else, so they haven't done anything wrong.

[Shaun]

Originally Posted by Cherie

But the person was got the most votes will be safe so

I think it's fair to be miffed if your votes have meant that someone who finished 3rd in VTS, and was safe, gets evicted over whoever was bottom.