[Kizzy]

They are and yet that's going to be overshadowed by her bony fingers pointing at Corbyn due to her suggestions 'we are to blame' for terrorism..... :/

No love YOU and your party are, from the drones to the reduction in policing, the ill equipped forces and the deviation from PREVENT.

She is the one with blood on her hands.

[Northern Monkey]

She is fecking terrible.This should've been the easiest election campaign ever.I mean just look at the opposition.She didn't need to do anything.She could've sat at home and watched telly with her feet up and still won.
How is she fecking this up?

I mean foxhunting?

Reversing an ivory ban?

Is she deliberately trying to lose?

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

She is fecking terrible.This should've been the easiest election campaign ever.I mean just look at the opposition.She didn't need to do anything.She could've sat at home and watched telly with her feet up and still won.
How is she fecking this up?

I mean foxhunting?

Reversing an ivory ban?

Is she deliberately trying to lose?

She was just so comfortable in her lead, that she felt she could put forward anything and assumed that not enough people would switch to Labour or UKIP... She's half right tbf... for now.. I think more people are becoming savvy to her dark dystopian future though

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Withano

She was just so comfortable in her lead, that she felt she could put forward anything and assumed that not enough people would switch to Labour or UKIP... She's half right tbf... for now.. I think more people are becoming savvy to her dark dystopian future though

This is what i thought too.Now i just think she doesn't think she's strong and stable enough for the job so she's throwing the towel in.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

She is fecking terrible.This should've been the easiest election campaign ever.I mean just look at the opposition.She didn't need to do anything.She could've sat at home and watched telly with her feet up and still won.
How is she fecking this up?

I mean foxhunting?

Reversing an ivory ban?

Is she deliberately trying to lose?

No.. She's appealing for sponsors for her campaign, have you seen the spike in tory donations since the election was called? That's not from joe bloggs the roofer... that's essentially her lobbying, fund us and we'll look after your interests, not the proles!

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

No.. She's appealing for sponsors for her campaign, have you seen the spike in tory donations since the election was called? That's not from joe bloggs the roofer... that's essentially her lobbying, fund us and we'll look after your interests, not the proles!

Makes sense

[Denver]

Corbyn not wants to take safety away from the people so remind me who is bad

[Nicky91]

i'm sorry but can i say that i find Theresa May such a nice lady

i prefer her above miss angela merkel

[lostalex]

Theresa may is the best that Britain has to offer, and i agree she is not good.

but the rest are much worse.

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Theresa may is the best that Britain has to offer, and i agree she is not good.

but the rest are much worse.

yeah well maybe she just needs time, and yeah the rest are really worse choices for UK

[joeysteele]

She needs time alright,to clear off with her deceit and lies,her word meaning not a jot and with the extreme heartless policies she presides over and the truly vile things she supports too.
Time to clear off and hold those rotten cruel views but somewhere where she cannot implement them.

She's totally false,a liar and truly cruel individual who is not only not fit to be Prime Minister but also not fit for any major public office whatsoever.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

She needs time alright,to clear off with her deceit and lies,her word meaning not a jot and with the extreme heartless policies she presides over and the truly vile things she supports too.
Time to clear off and hold those rotten cruel views but somewhere where she cannot implement them.

She's totally false,a liar and truly cruel individual who is not only not fit to be Prime Minister but also not fit for any major public office whatsoever.

At least she hasn't hob-nobbed with the IRA which out-does anything you can accuse May of. Such behaviour is definely not fit for any major public office.

[jaxie]

The problem with the left is that they don't have anything to offer either. The last Labour government left the country in a financial mess we've been paying for ever since. In the manifesto they make big promises that are far from realistic. They have a weak and ineffectual leader who makes May look a very positive option by comparison. His whole shadow cabinet walked out at one point because none of them had any faith in him. They throw around talk of 'New Labour as if it was some other party when many of those MPs are still there.

Politics in this country is a mess and there isn't a whole lot of choice to make that better. Though in my view the Tories have their act together far more than Labour do.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jaxie

The problem with the left is that they don't have anything to offer either. The last Labour government left the country in a financial mess we've been paying for ever since.

Are we STILL on this, nearly 10 years later? It was a GLOBAL recession. Global!

G-L-O-B-A-L, world-wide, international, planetary, affecting every country.

Caused by irresponsibility in the financial and banking sectors.

GLOBALLY.

It wasn't "caused by Labour" ffs.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Are we STILL on this, nearly 10 years later? It was a GLOBAL recession. Global!

G-L-O-B-A-L, world-wide, international, planetary, affecting every country.

Caused by irresponsibility in the financial and banking sectors.

GLOBALLY.

It wasn't "caused by Labour" ffs.

Some people just don't want to get that TS; just as they don't want to believe Corbyn wasn't hobnobbing it with the IRA. They may not have a bullet for their gun but that doesn't stop them carrying that gun. If they've lost their ammunition, the gun can still intimidate and perhaps persuade people.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Some people just don't want to get that TS; just as they don't want to believe Corbyn wasn't hobnobbing it with the IRA. They may not have a bullet for their gun but that doesn't stop them carrying that gun. If they've lost their ammunition, the gun can still intimidate and perhaps persuade people.

So all these people are liars are they and the pics are false?
http://news.sky.com/story/labour-lea...g-ira-10894557

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

So all these people are liars are they and the pics are false?
http://news.sky.com/story/labour-lea...g-ira-10894557

The wonderful Dianne Abbott has put her foot in it again, admitting this morning that he did meet IRA bombers, you couldn't ruddy make it up with this lot.
John McDonnell apologising from the bottom of his heart for the atrocious things he said about those 'heroic' IRA and the use of bombs and bullets.
Far from the two lying beggars trying to help the peace process it is widely known they were totally against anything but the unity of Ireland.
No amount of trying to cover it all up or spout the bull**** they find so easy to waffle on about it will convince the many who know better.
Shame it has come back to haunt them all these years later....those ruddy skeletons in cupboards eh

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

So all these people are liars are they and the pics are false?
http://news.sky.com/story/labour-lea...g-ira-10894557

Sky News are incredibly biased towards the Tories though, I remember the Cameron vs Milliband Election.

[jaxie]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Are we STILL on this, nearly 10 years later? It was a GLOBAL recession. Global!

G-L-O-B-A-L, world-wide, international, planetary, affecting every country.

Caused by irresponsibility in the financial and banking sectors.

GLOBALLY.

It wasn't "caused by Labour" ffs.

Of course, it was global, Labour overspent and made a mess of things but naturally something else is to bear all the blame. There couldn't possibly have been any mismanagement on their part.
They went to war in Iraq but that was 'New Labour', all those still sitting have been wiped clean with the purity of the Jeremy Terroist Sympathies Corbyn waters since then. Ahem.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by jaxie

Of course, it was global, Labour overspent and made a mess of things but naturally something else is to bear all the blame. There couldn't possibly have been any mismanagement on their part.
They went to war in Iraq but that was 'New Labour', all those still sitting have been wiped clean with the purity of the Jeremy Terroist Sympathies Corbyn waters since then. Ahem.

I couldn't give a flying **** about slating Blair or Brown because they were made from the same mould as the present Tory government. There were only two options after the world crash... sell the gold and prop up the banks or drop neoliberal politics forever and move away from a market run government.

We can't argue about how much Brown spent without knowing and understanding what led us up to the financial crisis. There was a housing bubble in the U.S. The financial industry was de-regulated and so the housing bubble burst and led to the worst financial crisis since the crash of 29 and that financial crisis quickly made its way across the Atlantic.

What Brown did was no different to what our present neoliberal government would of done or will do if it happens again... and it will happen again. When we get a world crash, everyone's deficit sours. The Labour deficit wasn't caused by overspending, it was caused by the economic crash being put into the hands of a neoliberal government.

[Livia]

People who don't support the Tories are not going to think Theresa May is very good, and all those who feel the same will support them. Meanwhile, the alternative is terrorist-appeasing Corbyn. If Corbyn had been in power in the 1930s I can imagine him returning from Germany waving a piece of paper and talking about peace in our time.

You support Hamas, I don't support you.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Are we STILL on this, nearly 10 years later? It was a GLOBAL recession. Global!

G-L-O-B-A-L, world-wide, international, planetary, affecting every country.

Caused by irresponsibility in the financial and banking sectors.

GLOBALLY.

It wasn't "caused by Labour" ffs.

Exactly right.

There's a lot of probable nonsense spouted as to blame but it was coming no matter who was in government across near all major Nations.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by jaxie

The problem with the left is that they don't have anything to offer either. The last Labour government left the country in a financial mess we've been paying for ever since. In the manifesto they make big promises that are far from realistic. They have a weak and ineffectual leader who makes May look a very positive option by comparison. His whole shadow cabinet walked out at one point because none of them had any faith in him. They throw around talk of 'New Labour as if it was some other party when many of those MPs are still there.

Politics in this country is a mess and there isn't a whole lot of choice to make that better. Though in my view the Tories have their act together far more than Labour do.

BIB, the financial mess was the recession that George W Bush's party caused in America as their Banks went a-wall.

[joeysteele]

We'd always have been paying some way for the mess that came in 2007/8.
No matter what govt had been in.
Before that crash Labour had presided over an unprecedented 10 years of growth, began by John Major's govt in 1997.

What Labour failed to do was prepare for really bad times,however no one saw the banking crash coming.
The Cons between 2005 and 2010 criticised Labour for regulating the Banks too much,the Cons wanted the Banks regulated less.

The crash was coming whether Labour,Conservative or coalition were in govt.
It affected near all the major Nations.

Labour chose a financial path to deal with it,the Cons would have likely,as they did near all through the 80s,chosen lost working lives with very high unemployment again.
Human cost over financial cost.
Labour rightly or wrongly chose a financial cost.

It's not about short memories but simply being fair,no matter how good any govt may have been up to 2007/8,Labour or Conservative.
That banking issue and crash would still have hit extremely hard with hard consequences,no matter what path was chosen to help solve it.

[Tom4784]

She's utterly woeful. Nothing but catchphrases and platitudes.