[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by LemonJam

Don't feed the troll guys and gals. Only someone truly stupid could think that way

Insulting a forum member is hardly the way forward now is it..

[LemonJam]

Not really a forum member as much as a troll but ok

[Northern Monkey]

I agree with you on the ‘progressive’ left.More regressive than anything.

Not on homosexuality though.If you look throughout history you’ll see that it is normal.
It’s been documented in ancient Greece(spartans were pretty well known for it),Ancient Rome,India,Samurai in Japan and possibly ancient Egypt.I’d bet it’s been around since the dawn of mankind.
Imo it’s just natures way of trying to keep the population down.Although it hasn’t really worked.

[Shaun]

guys he's fighting the PC culture let him be

[Liberty4eva]

Originally Posted by Shaun

guys he's fighting the PC culture let him be

Thank you.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Liberty4eva

Thank you.

He is not agreeing with you - but many don’t agree with him.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Liberty4eva

Thank you.

Tbh you're way off on some points but I agree PC culture has gone too far .

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by Liberty4eva

How could they decry oppression of women but embrace the hijab as a symbol of feminism?

religious tolerance

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by montblanc

religious tolerance

Tolerance would be "they wear the hijab, and that's fine." Trying to make out the hijab is actually empowering is just barmy.

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Tolerance would be "they wear the hijab, and that's fine." Trying to make out the hijab is actually empowering is just barmy.

there isn't a set bracket for empowerment

liberation lies in choice

[Marches]

Originally Posted by montblanc

there isn't a set bracket for empowerment

liberation lies in choice

Empowerment is only an argument when it suits a narrative, right?

And it’s not like most of these women are forced to wear hijabs or anything or the religion they follow doesn’t respect women

Hmm

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by Marches

Empowerment is only an argument when it suits a narrative, right?

And it’s not like most of these women are forced to wear hijabs or anything or the religion they follow doesn’t respect women

Hmm

a lot of women wear their hijab by choice actually

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by montblanc

there isn't a set bracket for empowerment

liberation lies in choice

Like people actually believe it is usually by choice. And the world is square. It’s called turning a blind eye for convenience.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by montblanc

religious tolerance

Religion is only tolerated in certain circumstances, look at Anne Widdecombe as a case in point

[Crimson Dynamo]

Just look at Oxfam

[bots]

i would have thought the majority wear it out of habit

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i would have thought the majority wear it out of habit

Abit like a nun?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

Abit like a nun?

Shame, shame, shame, shame, shame, shame, shame...

[Tozzie]

Originally Posted by Liberty4eva

For years I couldn't understand so called "progressives". How could they decry oppression of women but embrace the hijab as a symbol of feminism? Why do they use the argument it's the woman's body on abortion but insist "grid girls" don't have the right to use their body to do their job while leaving the female porn stars employed? Why do they insist on more "diversity" for every European country on earth but never mention bringing more diversity to non-European countries? Why do they want, more and more, to tell kids that there are 40 genders, that it's normal to be a homosexual, etc. etc?

Those are some examples of many. These actions are hard to understand but I have a theory that seems to explain everything: They are obsessed with degeneracy in every form. They force it on other people to make them feel empowered.

I guess this is more of a statement of my belief than a topic of discussion but I had to vent a little. I feel better now.

All this goes through my mind every day

[Jamie89]

If anything, the number of people who come out might increase slightly (it's a small percentage of people that are gay and a far smaller percentage who never come out), and if that's the case then good! It doesn't mean there are actually more gay people. (I think if anything though it would be the number of Bi people that come out that would increase rather than gay people). And even hypothetically if the gays were to take over () we can still reproduce (and want to just as much as any straight people)