[smudgie]

Just one of 37 investigations involving other people as well.
For me the news is why were they found guilty when they had already been cleared twice.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Just one of 37 investigations involving other people as well.
For me the news is why were they found guilty when they had already been cleared twice.

Surely this 'about-face' has nothing to do with covert 'pressure' from any 'pro-EU' Brexit-Saboteurs, Smudgie.

[Crimson Dynamo]

oh dear

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...g-for-ed-stone

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42411144

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

oh dear

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...g-for-ed-stone

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42411144

Like i said....wtf do you expect from a load of politicians.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

oh dear

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...g-for-ed-stone

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42411144

Those layers of moral high ground are rapidly being peeled away.

[Tom4784]

I wonder how Labour scandals affect this story in any way shape or form? Does digging for articles somehow make this Leave organisation less guilty of their crimes, I wonder?

[Livia]

If anyone is labouring under the misapprehension that the Electoral Commission only ever has problems with Tory returns, you're wrong. Like I've said before, most problems with expenses returns are because of ignorance rather than planning.

[Livia]

The trouble is that returns for all parties are more and more completed by amateurs because the parties don't want to pay for a professional. If there's any points scoring between the parties to be done, election expenses anomalies is not the fight to pick. They affect every party and will continue to do so until the parties cough up for qualified agents.