[Osjama]

Originally Posted by DouglasS

Many men have been convicted of rape/murder in court when they have been innocent, the law system is flawed in so many ways. The fact she is a woman is completely irrelevant.

Sometimes it’s relevant sometimes it’s not it depends who
Like there’s insane court bias against men in a lot of things, I think the stats for custody battles are smth insane like 84% or something.

[chuff me dizzy]

She changed her story too many times, and how did she know she was drugged with ketamine ( Something she told authorities straight away ?) she said in one version of her fairy tale she was taken to the foothills of the Alps in France, then it changed to Milan ,then she went shopping holding hands with her "kidnapper"

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

She changed her story too many times, and how did she know she was drugged with ketamine ( Something she told authorities straight away ?) she said in one version of her fairy tale she was taken to the foothills of the Alps in France, then it changed to Milan ,then she went shopping holding hands with her "kidnapper"

Oh dear

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by JerseyWins

Meh I'll believe it until proven wrong

this tbh

idkha so it's not like i have any reason NOT too

[JoshBB]

Regardless of how you feel about the way she's using her newfound fame, I definitely believe her. Two guys were found guilty, and one of them is serving 16 years in prison. I doubt someone would agree to that for a stunt, nor would the court allow something like that to happen.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

Regardless of how you feel about the way she's using her newfound fame, I definitely believe her. Two guys were found guilty, and one of them is serving 16 years in prison. I doubt someone would agree to that for a stunt, nor would the court allow something like that to happen.

Not only for her case, for numerous other cases

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Not only for her case, for numerous other cases

Well, that's just extra details really. The main point is that they were found guilty and so the evidence points to her telling the truth.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Not only for her case, for numerous other cases

So they were guilty of various other cases?

[JoshBB]

Honestly I think the disbelief solely stems from people's personal disliking of her, which sucks.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

Honestly I think the disbelief solely stems from people's personal disliking of her, which sucks.

In my case its nothing to do with disliking her as a person as before this charade started I had never heard of her, as Im sure was the case with a lot of others, but I followed the case and the holes in it are enough to convince me she a liar

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

In my case its nothing to do with disliking her as a person as before this charade started I had never heard of her, as Im sure was the case with a lot of others, but I followed the case and the holes in it are enough to convince me she a liar

Yes, well I'm sure you know far more than a professional judge in a law of court who is vastly more experienced and knowledgeable, don't you chuff?

[chuff me dizzy]

Name me another case where the kidnapper paid the ransom money ?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

Yes, well I'm sure you know far more than a professional judge in a law of court who is vastly more experienced and knowledgeable, don't you chuff?

You could well be right

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Name me another case where the kidnapper paid the ransom money ?

I don't know any, I'm sure you could find one though. Anyway, that is easily explainable from the Day 1 highlights -- Chloe said that she flirted with the kidnapper and made him fancy her so that she could manipulate him into releasing her. Extremely smart tbh and I admire her for being such a fighter

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

I don't know any, I'm sure you could find one though. Anyway, that is easily explainable from the Day 1 highlights -- Chloe said that she flirted with the kidnapper and made him fancy her so that she could manipulate him into releasing her. Extremely smart tbh and I admire her for being such a fighter

Have you even watched her interview above with Dr Phil ?

[Maru]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

Honestly I think the disbelief solely stems from people's personal disliking of her, which sucks.

I like her as she is my potential fave, but I don't necessarily have to believe everything she says to want to represent her... I don't see "victim" in her behavior, but rather seems to be a well-put together person and strong woman-type, albiet a bit antisocial... and I want to know that person...

I don't think anyone being skeptical of her story means that they also discount she didn't necessarily go through something major either... maybe it doesn't quite fit the typical depiction of kidnapping others have in their mind but it still resulted in severe Stockholm... her behavior is bizarre in any case, but if courts found some wrong-doing, then something clearly happened to her...