[Morgan.]

Trevor Boris

[annabelindabee]

I think they should take the two with the most votes from the housemates
and the two with the least votes from the public poll then there should be a game where they compete to save themselves along with the richest housemate who can save one of the four if they won...

I like that idea...

[Glenn.]

As long as it’s consistent each week then let them do it.

[kingston]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

As long as it’s consistent each week then let them do it.

The majority in this thread are the reason we in the BB community can’t have nice things... We’re at a point where people are outraged for the sake of being outraged... No doubt the same group would claim a completely stripped down series was boring if there were very minimal or no twists at all...

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

As long as it’s consistent each week then let them do it.

This.

The biggest problem with the show over the years has been an increase in unfairness and inconsistency. As long as the nomination/eviction process works like this for the remainder of the series, it's fine.

It's when they change the rules every week making the game completely unfair that it becomes a problem.

[supertv247]

It’s not back to back twists if they consistently do it every week, it’s just a new element to the format.

[kingston]

Originally Posted by supertv247

It’s not back to back twists if they consistently do it every week, it’s just a new element to the format.

Exactly... It’s not as if we haven’t had similar ‘twists’ in the past...

[y.winter]

What happens if one/two/all of the richest housemates are also to be nominated - will it be less than 6? Or are the richest housemates immune from noms (which sucks).

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by y.winter

What happens if one/two/all of the richest housemates are also to be nominated - will it be less than 6? Or are the richest housemates immune from noms (which sucks).

I thought that was the point of being the richest? It gives immunity?

[Morgan.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I thought that was the point of being the richest? It gives immunity?

The richest just gets to choose who plays in POV basically

[supertv247]

Only the ONE richest plays and chooses who else plays, I’m guessing if they’re nominated too then they just choose which 4 others play them and the other nominee

[JoshBB]

I hate it.

I just want normal noms + 2ormore going up, and it seems like we won't get that even ONCE under this format

[supertv247]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

I hate it.

I just want normal noms + 2ormore going up, and it seems like we won't get that even ONCE under this format

How? We don’t know if the viewer nomination is a weekly thing, so next week could be 2 up and that’s it. Or there might be no ‘replace’ after the save, so 3 up this week and 1 saved, so then 2 up..

[andybigbro]

Quite like the idea.

I quite liked BB11s save and replace so hopefully this is similar haha

[BBDodge]

Originally Posted by supertv247

Just explaining this new format, because I’ve seen like 4 different variations now of people misunderstanding!
It’s simple, and it’s consistent

On Sundays, Housemates nominate and the 2 or more with the most nominations face eviction
The viewer nominates to save and the housemate with the least votes joins them in facing eviction
On Tuesdays, 6 people - the nominated housemates, plus richest housemate, plus whoever else the richest housemates picks - play the game changer (save and replace / power of veto) and the winner can save someone from facing eviction but does not have to
On Wednesday’s show, nominations are final and the vote is open for Friday’s eviction

I like it

So to make it 6 people if only 2 are nominated for eviction by the housemates where does the 6th one come from?

An if the housemates nominate 4 or more then it will be more than 6.

The 6 people bit doesn't fit.