FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tech, Movies & Video Games Discuss technology, movies and video games here. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
2
1 4 3 3 is a mess plot wise but still an enjoyable movie in its own right. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I did not mind 4 but it was a bit teeny boppery and I could not take Emma Roberts being the killer seriously. The first 3 had more chemistry! The 5th one needs to focus more on Sydney Gail and Dewey but Gail Dewey or both should die.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
It should open with Dewey's funeral, and Gale's grief tips her over the edge and she is Ghostface for that movie.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
Just watching 3 now and the Gale and Dewey are definitely shown too much, Scream is Sidney's story fundamentally and she feels like a secondary character to them.
I do like Sid's character development though, living in high security (unlike Cotton who is apparently a big celebrity who lives in an unguarded house which is right next to a major road and their doors are unlocked...hmm) and taking on a job as an phone councellor for abused woman feels very in character for her.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
In my Cop era
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I don't mind since I found Parker Posey and Courtney Cox hilarious (despite Cox's HORRIFIC haircut). |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
Quote:
Parker Posey was amazing though, definitely the best part of the movie, would have liked to see her survive actually and kill off Patrick Dempsey.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
♡☯♡☮♡☯♡☮♡
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
The thing I didn't like about Roman was didn't they retcon that he was behind the killers in Scream 1 and 2? Like the puppeteer? I HATED that.
If I've remembered it right. Lol |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
Why So Serious?
|
Quote:
Roman was the True Main Antagonist of the first 3 Movies |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
It still doesn't make sense to me that Roman targetted Sid. Yes I understand him feeling anger towards Maureen because she turned him away but Sid never knew.
Just felt like a silly plot device rather than a believable development in the story like Billy's mum wanting revenge.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Yeah, but you could say that about Billy. Sid had nothing to do with what happened between his parents and hers.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
|
||||
Lisa Scott-Lee Expert
|
At least Scream 3 was believable with the fact that there was only one killer. The rest you all have some “psycho” sidekick with no real motive other than killing for fun.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|