[Marsh.]

Good.

Bloody outrageous shops are selling stuff like this in 2019.

[Lostie!]

Sad sad people

[bots]

In fairness they could have labelled the ducks; poodle poo, vomit and tasty ... it was racist.

[Livia]

M&S should have apologised for charging £8 for £3 worth of chocolate.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Livia

M&S should have apologised for charging £8 for £3 worth of chocolate.

C'mon now livia you cant expect poor m&s to apologise for something waitrose did

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Josy

C'mon now livia you cant expect poor m&s to apologise for something waitrose did

Oops... LOL...

Well Waitrose, M&S, same meat different gravy. Full of overpriced stuff and pretentious customers who have kids with silly names... "Apple, Alfonso, Angharad, come on children...". Wish I was middle-class enough to cope with it.

[Northern Monkey]

I honestly didn’t know ducks had races.


Edit:As in different ethnic races.Not duck racing....If that’s a thing.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

I honestly didn’t know ducks had races.


Edit:As in different ethnic races.Not duck racing....If that’s a thing.

Youtube video

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Youtube video

I’ve actually watched and bet on sheep racing.Not ducks though.

[montblanc]

idk if it's just me being hypersensitive but having the darkest color called 'ugly' is pretty sketchy

probably for the best that it's pulled

[Livia]

Originally Posted by montblanc

idk if it's just me being hypersensitive but having the darkest color called 'ugly' is pretty sketchy

probably for the best that it's pulled

It's CHOCOLATE.

[Cherie]

I think people have just missed the point that it is tied to ugly duckling story but then the ugly duckling was a cygnet so really they should have had two ducks and a cygnet if they wanted to represent it properly

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I think people have just missed the point that it is tied to ugly duckling story but then the ugly duckling was a cygnet so really they should have had two ducks and a cygnet if they wanted to represent it properly

They’d probably cost £15 a box if they did that.Who has a Cygnet mold kicking about?

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I think people have just missed the point that it is tied to ugly duckling story but then the ugly duckling was a cygnet so really they should have had two ducks and a cygnet if they wanted to represent it properly

The ugly one ends up to be the hero of the story. Maybe the white people who complained are the racist ones... not wanting a dark brown "duckling" being the hero...?

I'd be really interested to know how many black people complained... not many I reckon because they understand... it's CHOCOLATE!

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Livia

The ugly one ends up to be the hero of the story. Maybe the white people who complained are the racist ones... not wanting a dark brown "duckling" being the hero...?

I'd be really interested to know how many black people complained... not many I reckon because they understand... it's CHOCOLATE!

could have been worse, they could have emblazoned a cross on its back for good measure, that really would have sent the people with too much time on their hands into meltdown....pun

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

It's CHOCOLATE.

But you wouldn't be happy if they made the Jewish chocolate duck ugly

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

But you wouldn't be happy if they made the Jewish chocolate duck ugly

If they were trying to represent Jews, then I'd agree.

But they weren't.

They were selling chocolate ducks.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Livia

If they were trying to represent Jews, then I'd agree.

But they weren't.

They were selling chocolate ducks.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

If they were trying to represent Jews, then I'd agree.

But they weren't.

They were selling chocolate ducks.

What if its bill was circumcised though.

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by Livia

It's CHOCOLATE.

yes BUT i can also understand how this product can rub someone the wrong way

[Livia]

Originally Posted by montblanc

yes BUT i can also understand how this product can rub someone the wrong way

So you agree with the white woman who complained?

Making out that black people would be insulted by what is essentially a bit of chocolate does nothing to help race relations. It makes it seem like black people complain about all kinds of stuff... when in actuality, it's white people being offended on their behalf.

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by Livia

So you agree with the white woman who complained?

Making out that black people would be insulted by what is essentially a bit of chocolate does nothing to help race relations. It makes it seem like black people complain about all kinds of stuff... when in actuality, it's white people being offended on their behalf.

i don't really agree with her because calling this "racist" is a joke i just can understand why someone could feel weird about the darkest of three different colored ducks being called ugly

[montblanc]

like it'd be different if they were all the same shade but they aren't so it's just not a good look at all

[montblanc]

with that being said though calling this racist is a bit of a stretch

[Livia]

Originally Posted by montblanc

with that being said though calling this racist is a bit of a stretch

Chocolate.

LOL.... And you know, I hate dark chocolate. if I was black I'd be pissed off being identified with the worst chocolate in the world.