[Oliver_W]

Go Johnny, drag that lying bitch for all it's worth.

Spoiler:

and then go for Amber

[GoldHeart]

I never believed Amber heard , as others have said she comes across Psycho !.

Hope Johnny Depp is successful with suing Wooton the scumbag .

[Amy Jade]

I still like Amber and think she's an excellent actress but I fully believe they were abusive to each other and both did wrong 100% so shes silly making out she was some beaten down fragile ex

[Oliver_W]

I wonder if people will be trying to get her movie roles cancelled, like they were with Depp? Is she gonna be in Aquaman 2?

[Jigs]

Dan Wootton is the Perez of this decade. He's a successful man but at what cost?

[Liam-]

But back to Johnny, I was ready a reporters tweets from the trial and it sounded like he got a battering by the Sun’s defence for being a historic drunk and drug taker, but he handled it well by all accounts and then Herd walked past him in the corridor and stared him out trying to intimidate him

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Liam-

But back to Johnny, I was ready a reporters tweets from the trial and it sounded like he got a battering by the Sun’s defence for being a historic drunk and drug taker, but he handled it well by all accounts and then Herd walked past him in the corridor and stared him out trying to intimidate him

Are they suggesting his history of drinking and drugs makes it ok for them to post sh*t about him and ruin his career?

As for Herd, I saw the image of her walking into court linking the arms of her lawyer and was it a friend or sister or something? She's a performer. All I'll say is it doesn't say much for him that he was so easily duped by her if the stories of her pretending she had the same interest and hobbies as him to get to the point where he married her. A bloody mess of a relationship.

It is nice to see his exes come out in support of him though.

[Beso]

****ing weirdo.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by parmnion

****ing weirdo.

Wooton or Amber?

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[Tom4784]

Given what we know now, I think it's wrong to paint both sides as equally wrong. She's a psychological abuser, she put him in a position where she basically said she could do what she wanted to him and he'd be the villain and she proved it right with her lies to the world.

He was likely broken down by her abuse and lashed out which isn't right but it doesn't make him an abuser either. If you were to flip the genders, would you say a woman is an abuser if she is abused, finally snaps and lashes out? According to the law, she wouldn't be considered so given that there was a murder charge that was overturned a year or two ago with a woman who, after years of abuse, killed her husband. She was found guilty, I believe but then the courts recognised the effects of things like psychological abuse and coercive control and overturned it and I believe they wrote it into law as a justifiable defense although I'd have to google that last bit.

It's an extreme example, but, regardless of gender, if you abuse someone and they eventually snap, it doesn't make them an abuser for defending themselves.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Given what we know now, I think it's wrong to paint both sides as equally wrong. She's a psychological abuser, she put him in a position where she basically said she could do what she wanted to him and he'd be the villain and she proved it right with her lies to the world.

He was likely broken down by her abuse and lashed out which isn't right but it doesn't make him an abuser either. If you were to flip the genders, would you say a woman is an abuser if she is abused, finally snaps and lashes out? According to the law, she wouldn't be considered so given that there was a murder charge that was overturned a year or two ago with a woman who, after years of abuse, killed her husband. She was found guilty, I believe but then the courts recognised the effects of things like psychological abuse and coersive control and overturned it and I believe they wrote it into law as a justifiable defense although I'd have to google that last bit.

It's an extreme example, but, regardless of gender, if you abuse someone and they eventually snap, it doesn't make them an abuser for defending themselves.

Yes, I agree with you 100%.
And his exes all defended him. Surely if he had a history of violence it would have come out already?
She's a narcissistic sociopath and painted herself as the victim.
When in fact she was the abuser.

[arista]

Looks the Sun
may win.

After she said he was high of drugs
no wonder he can not remember

[Marsh.]

Being on drugs is not proof he's a wife beater.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Being on drugs is not proof he's a wife beater.

Yes, I agree.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Being on drugs is not proof he's a wife beater.

Of course
but can effect his correct memory..................

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by arista

Of course
but can effect his correct memory..................

But there's no evidence whatsoever that he's an abuser.
We only have her word for it. And she actually has a history of abuse

[arista]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

But there's no evidence whatsoever that he's an abuser.
We only have her word for it. And she actually has a history of abuse

[Johnny Depp sent texts referring
to his ex-wife Amber Heard as "a witch"
and saying "let's burn Amber", the High Court
has been told during the second day
of a high-profile libel action against The Sun newspaper.]


https://news.sky.com/story/johnny-de...hears-12024026

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Being on drugs is not proof he's a wife beater.

I agree with this but he's denying everything when there are eye witnesses and recordings of him threatening her.

I'll admit I thought this was very clear cut and she had just taken advantage but there is physical evidence that he threatened to kill her, set her corpse alight and then perform necrophilia upon the remains. They have the texts of him saying it to Paul Bettany.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

I agree with this but he's denying everything when there are eye witnesses and recordings of him threatening her.

I'll admit I thought this was very clear cut and she had just taken advantage but there is physical evidence that he threatened to kill her, set her corpse alight and then perform necrophilia upon the remains. They have the texts of him saying it to Paul Bettany.

Tbf, joking about killing the wife you're currently in the process of bitterly splitting from is not the same as threatening to me.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Tbf, joking about killing the wife you're currently in the process of bitterly splitting from is not the same as threatening to me.

Saying 'oh I'll kill her' I'd get but kill, burn and shag the charred corpse? the bloke is bat shít

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

Saying 'oh I'll kill her' I'd get but kill, burn and shag the charred corpse? the bloke is bat shít

Well I think we can agree they're both batsh*t but talking sh*t about someone behind their back (no matter how, shall we say, colourful) is not the same as making a serious threat.

I don't think she was in any danger of him actually doing that to her. It probably illustrates the level of hatred they would feel for one another that they would make such comments. A very toxic relationship.

[Oliver_W]

I loved a little nugget I saw on twitter that he said over the trial:

"I don't have an anger problem. I laugh sometimes, and I don't have a laughter problem."