[Wizard.]

Originally Posted by arista

You Strict Bitch

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

You Strict Bitch

Don't you know it.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Whew, we’re safe lads!

I can't see Tweets for some reason but I hope this means (judging from others' responses) that she isn't making money from this game?

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I can't see Tweets for some reason but I hope this means (judging from others' responses) that she isn't making money from this game?

Yes, some nerdy game site did some digging and it looks like she won’t be getting any royalties because WB own the rights or something

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Yes, some nerdy game site did some digging and it looks like she won’t be getting any royalties because WB own the rights or something

WB

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

Originally Posted by arista

You Strict Bitch

Screaming

[Marsh.]

Of course she'll have earned money from it.

[Barry.]

When I get a ps5 I’ll be buying it

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

It’s coming out on ps4 too appaz

[Barry.]

Originally Posted by Fetch The Bolt Cutters

It’s coming out on ps4 too appaz

Even better

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Of course she'll have earned money from it.

Not directly from this game specifically, I assume it means she sold video game rights to WB in full at some point in the past, probably for a large sum but that's a "done deal" and she won't earn money dependant on sales of this game.

Then again, I'd be somewhat surprised if they didn't consult her on a few story/world elements and pay a consultation fee for that, but again that would be a flat fee not linked to actual sales.

See there's PLENTY of mental gymnastics available for enjoying the Wizarding World created by JK Rowling whilst still believing her to be an avatar of pure hatred, Marsh.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Not directly from this game specifically, I assume it means she sold video game rights to WB in full at some point in the past, probably for a large sum but that's a "done deal" and she won't earn money dependant on sales of this game.

Then again, I'd be somewhat surprised if they didn't consult her on a few story/world elements and pay a consultation fee for that, but again that would be a flat fee not linked to actual sales.

See there's PLENTY of mental gymnastics available for enjoying the Wizarding World created by JK Rowling whilst still believing her to be an avatar of pure hatred, Marsh.

I'd be very surprised if those sold rights didn't come with at least an agreed percentage of royalties given how valuable the franchise is.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I'd be very surprised if those sold rights didn't come with at least an agreed percentage of royalties given how valuable the franchise is.

I'd be surprised if it was now because gaming is such a huge industry now, but she might have naively sold the video game rights back when the PS1 games were being made, as the money in games wasn't anything like it is now. As I said though, given how detailed the game is likely to be, I'd be very surprised if she wasn't consulted.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I'd be surprised if it was now because gaming is such a huge industry now, but she might have naively sold the video game rights back when the PS1 games were being made, as the money in games wasn't anything like it is now. As I said though, given how detailed the game is likely to be, I'd be very surprised if she wasn't consulted.

Yeah, true. It's not just that but she's known to be very guarded over the rights to Harry Potter and doesn't relinquish them easily. I think it's very rare she sells them off without any input at all.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Not directly from this game specifically, I assume it means she sold video game rights to WB in full at some point in the past, probably for a large sum but that's a "done deal" and she won't earn money dependant on sales of this game.

Then again, I'd be somewhat surprised if they didn't consult her on a few story/world elements and pay a consultation fee for that, but again that would be a flat fee not linked to actual sales.

See there's PLENTY of mental gymnastics available for enjoying the Wizarding World created by JK Rowling whilst still believing her to be an avatar of pure hatred, Marsh.

This is why she's "uncancelable" because not even people who hate her want to boycott her work so make up reasons why it's not really supporting her

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

This is why she's "uncancelable" because not even people who hate her want to boycott her work so make up reasons why it's not really supporting her

I find it tough to understand really, even if she was everything she's made out to be... If I didn't read books/watch movies/play games that had involvement from people with "murky" personal lives and opinions, I'd have a VERY limited library . I've read some great literature by authors with far worse strikes on their resume than anything JK Rowling is accused of. "I only consume content from people I agree with" is just such a closed system.