Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-10-2020, 02:00 PM #1
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thesheriff443 View Post
I’ve just watched the clip, for me it falls under kids performing an erotic dance routine wich is not really appropriate but look at most girl groups, they do those types of dance routines all the time and it’s aimed at a young audience.
Yes but the girls in girl-groups themselves are usually over 18 or at the very least over 16, it's hardly the same as getting 11 year olds to twerk on camera.
user104658 is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 02:01 PM #2
Cherie's Avatar
Cherie Cherie is offline
This Witch doesn't burn
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 69,025

Favourites (more):
Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey
BB19: Sian


Cherie Cherie is offline
This Witch doesn't burn
Cherie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 69,025

Favourites (more):
Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey
BB19: Sian


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
Yes but the girls in girl-groups themselves are usually over 18 or at the very least over 16, it's hardly the same as getting 11 year olds to twerk on camera.
exactly the point
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beso
Livelier than Izaaz, and hes got 2 feet.
Cherie is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 02:50 PM #3
thesheriff443 thesheriff443 is offline
thesheriff443
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 16,390


thesheriff443 thesheriff443 is offline
thesheriff443
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 16,390


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
Yes but the girls in girl-groups themselves are usually over 18 or at the very least over 16, it's hardly the same as getting 11 year olds to twerk on camera.
The problem is my old fruit, 11 years are doing this on camera all over the world with tik tok and other similar platforms.

Monkey see monkey do I’m afraid.

Last edited by thesheriff443; 08-10-2020 at 02:50 PM.
thesheriff443 is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 01:39 PM #4
Nicky91's Avatar
Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
Nicky91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Default

it was first released by BAC Films

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAC_Films


yes Netflix made a mistake here by getting the rights for this



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma%C3%..._Doucour%C3%A9

this is that director of this



apparently also one of france's new rising star directors (already won few movie awards for earlier work)
__________________
Strictly 2025 Favourite: George & Alexis, Karen & Carlos

but Amber Davies, my Queen of Strictly and West End!



#ProIsrael <3
Nicky91 is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 01:42 PM #5
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

I believe that the film makers THOUGHT they were sending a message/social commentary and that it was fine in that sense.

In reality however it was a hopelessly misjudged and frankly reckless piece of film making, and equally ill-judged for Netflix to pick it up.

So while I don't think they were deliberately promoting child porn, I do think there should be strong consequences, to make it clear that there is and must always be "a line" when it comes to imagery of children, and film making practices that are exploitative of child actors.

There seems to be a general idea on social media from people who think it's all fine that, because the girls in the film were well treated and looked after on set and because they enjoyed making the film, the "can't have been" being exploited but that's just obviously not the case. That's not how child safeguarding works at all.
user104658 is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 01:46 PM #6
Nicky91's Avatar
Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
Nicky91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
I believe that the film makers THOUGHT they were sending a message/social commentary and that it was fine in that sense.

In reality however it was a hopelessly misjudged and frankly reckless piece of film making, and equally ill-judged for Netflix to pick it up.

So while I don't think they were deliberately promoting child porn, I do think there should be strong consequences, to make it clear that there is and must always be "a line" when it comes to imagery of children, and film making practices that are exploitative of child actors.

There seems to be a general idea on social media from people who think it's all fine that, because the girls in the film were well treated and looked after on set and because they enjoyed making the film, the "can't have been" being exploited but that's just obviously not the case. That's not how child safeguarding works at all.
i watched that trailer, can't say i immediately thought of ''child porn'' i found it just very very weird, children behaving like adults

Netflix overall have good movies, series (i'm very happy myself with its content, and also that it gets renewed from time to time)


they made a mistake here, yes but they also look internationally to widen their movies, series content, this director lady probably ''advertised'' it well enough for them to acquire this one
__________________
Strictly 2025 Favourite: George & Alexis, Karen & Carlos

but Amber Davies, my Queen of Strictly and West End!



#ProIsrael <3
Nicky91 is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 01:48 PM #7
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

To add to that, I also think it would have been perfectly possible to make the same film with the same overall message without actually showing the kids doing anything. E.g. You could show the music videos/adults and them TALKING about emulating them in their own show, and then shown ONLY the crowd reaction to their show (while you would know they were copying the adults dancing, it wouldn't actually be shown).

I think the only reason they haven't gone that way is to be more "raw and edgy". To be "more impactful". No thanks.
user104658 is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 02:14 PM #8
Oliver_W Oliver_W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Bill's Secret Garden
Posts: 18,013

Favourites (more):
BBCanada 8: Chris
Apprentice 2019: Lottie


Oliver_W Oliver_W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Bill's Secret Garden
Posts: 18,013

Favourites (more):
BBCanada 8: Chris
Apprentice 2019: Lottie


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
To add to that, I also think it would have been perfectly possible to make the same film with the same overall message without actually showing the kids doing anything. E.g. You could show the music videos/adults and them TALKING about emulating them in their own show, and then shown ONLY the crowd reaction to their show (while you would know they were copying the adults dancing, it wouldn't actually be shown).

I think the only reason they haven't gone that way is to be more "raw and edgy". To be "more impactful". No thanks.
It's about the presentation as much as anything else. Like they could have shown the dancing but from a fixed camera angle from a way away. Then they could show the dance in its entirety, but the fixed angle would make it seem more uncomfortable and that the characters were being exploited instead of the actresses.

But by shooting it like a "sexy" music video just makes the director look like a creeper.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
I own a petrol car and my boobs are big enough.

Oliver_W is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 03:50 PM #9
Nicky91's Avatar
Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
Nicky91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W View Post
It's about the presentation as much as anything else. Like they could have shown the dancing but from a fixed camera angle from a way away. Then they could show the dance in its entirety, but the fixed angle would make it seem more uncomfortable and that the characters were being exploited instead of the actresses.

But by shooting it like a "sexy" music video just makes the director look like a creeper.
a creeper who can win awards with weird **** though
__________________
Strictly 2025 Favourite: George & Alexis, Karen & Carlos

but Amber Davies, my Queen of Strictly and West End!



#ProIsrael <3
Nicky91 is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 04:27 PM #10
Oliver_W Oliver_W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Bill's Secret Garden
Posts: 18,013

Favourites (more):
BBCanada 8: Chris
Apprentice 2019: Lottie


Oliver_W Oliver_W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Bill's Secret Garden
Posts: 18,013

Favourites (more):
BBCanada 8: Chris
Apprentice 2019: Lottie


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicky91 View Post
a creeper who can win awards with weird **** though
Hollywood is full of perverted filmmakers who get awards.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
I own a petrol car and my boobs are big enough.

Oliver_W is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 01:54 PM #11
Nicky91's Avatar
Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
Nicky91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Default

this evil woman of a director even promoted her ''movie'' so well, it won some awards
__________________
Strictly 2025 Favourite: George & Alexis, Karen & Carlos

but Amber Davies, my Queen of Strictly and West End!



#ProIsrael <3
Nicky91 is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 01:56 PM #12
Nicky91's Avatar
Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
Nicky91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Default



this was the debut film from this woman (and coincidentally another one with child actors/actresses)
__________________
Strictly 2025 Favourite: George & Alexis, Karen & Carlos

but Amber Davies, my Queen of Strictly and West End!



#ProIsrael <3
Nicky91 is offline  
Old 08-10-2020, 02:06 PM #13
Nicky91's Avatar
Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Nicky91 Nicky91 is offline
I <3 Amber, My dream wife
Nicky91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68,459


Default



here she is, a interview about why she made this movie

the whole arrogant way she proudly says she is the director of cuties too
__________________
Strictly 2025 Favourite: George & Alexis, Karen & Carlos

but Amber Davies, my Queen of Strictly and West End!



#ProIsrael <3
Nicky91 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
charges, child, cuties, indicted, netflix, porn


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts