[Candy Annie Cane]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i'm confused, is this interview not on netflix? If it is then they will be the ones that pocket any earnings from international TV rights

No, its not. They wanted it on non subscription channels so it ruled out Netflix and Amazon Prime apparently

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i'm confused, is this interview not on netflix? If it is then they will be the ones that pocket any earnings from international TV rights

No it isn't, it will be on ITV according to an article I just posted on it

[Rustic bauble]

I suppose if its on ITV we have a bit of down time every 20mins...

[Tom4784]

People who usually aren't one of the 'ists' can put their hands up and admit when they're wrong. They don't try to pass off slutshaming as a joke and then lash out at people for pointing it out.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

People who usually aren't one of the 'ists' can put their hands up and admit when they're wrong. They don't try to pass off slutshaming as a joke and then lash out at people for pointing it out.

I would if I WAS wrong. It was a light hearted remark, no offense meant at all.
I'm not going to crumble because some people chose to make a big ole mountain out of it because its me. I'm not daft.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jet

I would if I WAS wrong. It was a light hearted remark, no offense meant at all.

I'm not going to crumble because some people chose to make a big ole mountain out of it because its me. I'm not daft.

A tip jet; if your sexist jokes only have other men laughing and most women are saying it's sexist, then it's probably sensible to think "hmm was I maybe being a bit sexist?" and not "you meanies just don't understand my stellar sense of humour!"

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

A tip jet; if your sexist jokes only have other men laughing and most women are saying it's sexist, then it's probably sensible to think "hmm was I maybe being a bit sexist?" and not "you meanies just don't understand my stellar sense of humour!"

I wasn't being sexist, as I know I'm not, it was a light hearted remark but I apologize for any offense taken.

There have been other posts today, calling Meghan TRASHY, isn't that sexist? but no - one batted an eyelid. Hmmm....

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by jet

I wasn't being sexist, as I know I'm not, it was a light hearted remark but I apologize for any offense taken.

There have been other posts today, calling Meghan TRASHY, isn't that sexist? but no - one batted an eyelid. Hmmm....

To be fair people of both genders can be trashy. Meghan's trashiness has nothing to do with her sex.

[jet]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

THE BBC will not "pull out the chequebook" to obtain rights to the Meghan
Markle exclusive interview with Oprah Winfrey - despite the intentions of the
Duchess of Sussex.



But according to the Telegraph, Meghan wanted the 90-minute special to be
broadcasted on the BBC.

However, a source claimed the corporation was not involved in the fierce bid
war for international rights.

The source said: "We're not going to pull out the chequebook for that."

Instead of airing the "tell-all" interview, the BBC will broadcast a
Commonwealth Day celebration.

This special will feature messages from the Queen as well as Prince Charles,
Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, and Prince William and Kate, the Duchess
of Cambridge.

It is believed negotiations for international rights involved Sky and ITV.



In the past, Princess Diana’s interview with BBC Panorama shook the world,
but she was said to later regret some of the things she said.

Now, the Daily Mirror royal editor Russell Myers said the Oprah interview is a
"disaster waiting to happen".

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal...ii-royal-famil

Gorgeous pic of our future King and Queen. They look so happy together.

[Amy Jade]

People really are obsessed, good or bad.

I bet the interview will serve whoever screens it very well, people love talking about Meghan!

[Elliot]

Icons

[Scarlett.]

I really really don't understand this weird obsession everyone has with Meghan

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Scarlett.

I really really don't understand this weird obsession everyone has with Meghan

Same, and that goes for people on both sides of that particular fence.

Like, she's a bit ghastly, but not quite worthy of hatred. Nor is there anything much to love about her ... apart from "slay kween, she triggers the racists, we love to see it" or something

[Parmy]

Shes dull as dish water...and hes much the same.

Yet they demand to be celebs instead of royals..


I'd rather watch marco sabas 24/7.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Same, and that goes for people on both sides of that particular fence.

Like, she's a bit ghastly, but not quite worthy of hatred. Nor is there anything much to love about her ... apart from "slay kween, she triggers the racists, we love to see it" or something

I don't have any particular feelings about Harry and Meghan either way and if you absolutely had to push me, they're a little bit took "woke" for me to take entirely seriously but each to their own.

That's not going to stop me going in on the varying degrees of racism, classism and misogyny that oozes from those who will take any opportunity to attack Meghan... especially the ones who want to spin a "poor little Harry" narrative alongside.

[Christmas Lights]

Oh because the BBC is such a good broadcasting company aren't they with their innocent moral high ground ?? .

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I don't have any particular feelings about Harry and Meghan either way and if you absolutely had to push me, they're a little bit took "woke" for me to take entirely seriously but each to their own.

That's not going to stop me going in on the varying degrees of racism, classism and misogyny that oozes from those who will take any opportunity to attack Meghan... especially the ones who want to spin a "poor little Harry" narrative alongside.

Yeah I don’t buy that at all, I think he is worse because he knew what Meghan was getting into but when ahead with a showy wedding etc anyway, should have set out his stall from the off, he is in his 30s not 17

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I don't have any particular feelings about Harry and Meghan either way and if you absolutely had to push me, they're a little bit took "woke" for me to take entirely seriously but each to their own.

That's not going to stop me going in on the varying degrees of racism, classism and misogyny that oozes from those who will take any opportunity to attack Meghan... especially the ones who want to spin a "poor little Harry" narrative alongside.

I take it you're discussing people generally and not those on TiBB.

No one really knows. Not you, not me, not the haters, not the Fan Club... And the more speculation goes on the further from the truth everyone gets.

They want to be left alone. Let's help them with that.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

I take it you're discussing people generally and not those on TiBB.



No one really knows. Not you, not me, not the haters, not the Fan Club... And the more speculation goes on the further from the truth everyone gets.



They want to be left alone. Let's help them with that.

I would NEVER discuss other members or their various flavours of bigotry.

I can somewhat agree that they were a bit hard-line on the wanting to be left entirely alone if they still want to live a public life through their own work (and, it seems, they do) - choosing that as a career means accepting some degree of public comment.

That said, I don't think it should be a press free-for-all when it comes to celebrities and I don't think asking for the vitriolic press to lay off a bit is a huge ask. I would think it reasonable request from any high-profile individual. Public discourse is one thing but there should be tighter restrictions on the accuracy and tone of what's actually published, be that physical or digital.

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Scarlett.

I really really don't understand this weird obsession everyone has with Meghan

Well it’s Harry AND Meghan under discussion....and whilst they keep making headlines people will continue to discuss them...

[arista]

Originally Posted by Scarlett.

I really really don't understand this weird obsession everyone has with Meghan

Its Hatred
not obsession.



GMBHD itv
showed a new clip of James Corden
with the Prince Harry on a tour Bus
but then he goes on a mobile phone
and its Meghan

She calls the Prince "Haz"

[arista]

[Prince Harry has revealed he stepped back
from his royal duties because the British
press was "toxic" and was "destroying" his mental health.

The royal gave a candid interview to
British talk show
host James Corden's The Late Late Show - with the
pair touring Los Angeles on an open air bus
with afternoon tea.
Harry opened up about why he withdrew
from Royal duties, insisting "I did not walk away",
but had to leave due to the
British press affecting his mental health.

He said it was a "really difficult environment,
as I think a lot of people saw".
"We all know what the British press can be like.
And it was destroying my mental health. This is toxic."
He added: "So I did what any husband
and father would do - I need to get my family out of here.]


https://news.sky.com/story/prince-ha...ealth-12229258

[arista]

Pathetic BBC1AM

Had a brief clip
but only on silly stuff. (about the baby)

And James Corden is on UK SkyComedyHD


So BBC1AM put CBS USA.

[user104658]

Harry: "My mental health was suffering because of the toxic British press."

The British press: "He is LYING and being CONTROLLED, his mental health was suffering because of his toxic wife!"

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Harry: "My mental health was suffering because of the toxic British press."

The British press: "He is LYING and being CONTROLLED, his mental health was suffering because of his toxic wife!"

Exactly. Even if she is toxic and controlling, the rags don't exactly help.